ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1301|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

蓝皮P5-14

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-26 17:25:00 | 只看该作者

蓝皮P5-14

Federal agricultural programs aimed at benefiting one group whose livelihood depends on farming often end up harming another such group.

Which of the following statements provides support for the claim above?

I.                   An effort to help feed-grain producers resulted in higher prices for their crops, but the higher prices decreased the profits of livestock producers.

II.                In order to reduce crop surpluses and increase prices, growers of certain crops were paid to leave a portion of their land idle, but the reduction was not achieved because improvements in efficiency resulted in higher production on the land in use.

III.             Many farm workers were put out of work when a program meant to raise the price of grain provided grain growers with an incentive to reduce production by giving them surplus grain from government reserves.

A)    I, but not II and not III

B)     II, but not I and not III

C)    I and III, but not II

D)    II and III, but not I

E)     I, II and III

我没有理解这个III与原文有个什么关系,没看懂,请教大家

沙发
发表于 2008-7-27 02:07:00 | 只看该作者
政府某项措施使种植户可以减产不减收,而减产导致种植工人失业,正好符合题干政府取悦一个集团而损害另一集团的利益。没看懂是不是没有弄清grain growers和farm workers的关系。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-27 18:21:00 | 只看该作者
depends on farming often end up harming another such group.这里的such group我当时还理解为另一伙农民,然后Many farm workers were put out of work确实没理解好,谢谢LS
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-27 18:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部