ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1802|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 11 - 109

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-22 00:56:00 | 只看该作者

OG 11 - 109

109.Correctly measuring the productivity of service workers is complex. Consider, for example, postal workers: they are often said to be more productive if more letters are delivered per postal worker. But is this really true? What if more letters are lost or delayed per worker at the same time that more are delivered?

The objection implied above to the productivity measure described is based on doubts about the truth of which of the following statements?

  (A) Postal workers are representative of service workers in general.
  (B) The delivery of letters is the primary activity of the postal service.
  (C) Productivity should be ascribed to categories of workers, not to individuals.
  (D) The quality of services rendered can appropriately be ignored in computing productivity.
  (E) The number of letters delivered is relevant to measuring the productivity of postal workers.

不是很明白问题的意思,好绕啊。结合OG后面的解释更是糊涂了,哪位NN帮忙解释下这道题啦?

沙发
发表于 2008-7-22 21:52:00 | 只看该作者

希望以后把正确答案写上

是D吧?postal worker说只看数量,只要送的多,就是productive,但是文中反驳了,理由是,不能只看数量,还要看质量(是否有信丢失或者延迟送达)。这正好是D要说明的

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 07:48
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部