[求助]请教LSAT-1-4-22

dreadpower

22.It is illogical to infer a second and different effect from a cause which is known only by one particular effect. This is incorrect because the inferred effect must necessarily be produced by some different characteristic of the cause than is the observed effect, which already serves entirely to describe the cause.
Which one of the following arguments makes the same logical error as the one described by the author in the passage?
(A) An anonymous donor gave a thousand dollars to our historical society. I would guess that that individual also volunteers at the children’s hospital.
   答案是A：
   不是很能理解题干的意思，请牛牛指教，谢谢

Miracle

提干是这样翻译吧：
由只可能造成唯一结果的原因而推测出第二种或另一种结果是不和逻辑的。这样是错误的。因为这个推测出的结果肯定是由造成唯一结果的原因的其他特性所导致的， 而这些特性已经完全解释了这个原因。

好象比较坳口，其实就是如果有一个原因（前提或evidence）导致了结果，并不说明这个原因能导致其他结果。A正好是这种逻辑错误。

题目看懂就好了：-）

crusaders

翻译的好
up :]

dreadpower

翻译的真好！真厉害！！！谢谢两位！！！