ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2318|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]prep2-17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-17 23:27:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]prep2-17

17. (26864-!-item-!-188;#058&003368)

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.  Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.  Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

1. 请问NN, 这是不是一道削弱题?
2.答案是C, 可是C 直接与题目中的内容相反。题目中提到many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood,而C中说这些个customers只是exception
这样也可以吗?求教!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-18 09:13:00 | 只看该作者

ding by myself

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-18 17:56:00 | 只看该作者

ding again

地板
发表于 2008-10-11 10:32:00 | 只看该作者
waterlooer
帅哥哟,离线,有人找我吗?
    
等级:论坛游侠
文章:42
精华:0
积分:421
门派:无门无派
注册:2008年1月24日
2
 给waterlooer发送一个短消息
            把waterlooer加入好友
            查看waterlooer的个人资料
            搜索waterlooer在【GMAT逻辑专区】的所有贴子
            引用回复这个贴子
            回复这个贴子
        

发贴心情

我的想法是:

前提:高座椅能方便客户看明星(吸引客户),另外,就餐顾客使用高座椅时间少(提高流动率)。
结论:替换成高座椅(吸引就餐顾客、提高流动率)利润上升。

削弱方法:割断因果(有果无因),即:因(替换成高座椅吸引就餐顾客)本身不成立。

C选项说:选择高座椅的客户不是准备(逗留 lingering)用餐的客户,即:高座椅吸引的客户非就餐顾客,即利润来源。

请大家拍砖。

ip地址已设置保密
2008-8-10 14:02:00

            
5#
发表于 2009-7-25 00:45:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 03:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部