ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: jesuisdesole
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【7月至8月】阅读木几米青(更新07/21)

[精华] [复制链接]
61#
发表于 2008-7-3 16:04:00 | 只看该作者
版本1
關於地震預測的研究(個人印象,若網友找到相關機經,還請幫忙補充)
第一段:有人利用實驗室裡的rock與stress之間關係進行地震預測的研究
第二段:雖然上述的預測有時候靈驗,但有幾次地震前卻測不到stress,並無法準確有效地預測地震
第三段:之後又出現一個學者,他認為區域性的地震應該有其週期性,所以就在XXX斷層進行地震預測的研究,並預測該斷層應該每隔A年就會發生一次地震,但事實證明他的預測是錯誤的
第四段:雖然上述學者的研究失敗了,但卻啟發了一個研究方向,並促成研究地震預測的P學派產生,P學派的學者認為區域性的地震的確是有週期性但這週期性是long-term,因此主張XXX斷層應該在B年的期間內會發生十次地震
感想:文章偏長,有不少地球科學字彙,但文意不會太繞,題目難度中等,耐心不慌張,應可順利答題
版本2
讲 对地震的预测。文章脉络很清晰。第一段说以前科学家对地震的预测更关注其短期的异常,比如在地震之前会有哪些异常现象。这种预测方法确实取得了一些成功, 但后来发现这些所谓的地震前兆有时并不necessarily followed by great shakes。(反正就是这种方法其实有缺陷。)
第 二段说另一些科学家后来侧重用长期周期性的规律来预测地震,他们通过对一个旧金山断层(fault)的研究发现,其实地震有规律可寻,XX年一次。(文中 给了个数字,大概是二十几年)而且他们还根据这个规律预测某某年会发生地震。但是,这个地震并没有发生。(这一段就是说其实这个方法也有问题)
第三段是和第二段有关的演伸性内容,说 a third group of 科学家研究了过去更长时间的地震发生的资料,发现周期其实是平均132年发生一次,但方差却很大。

请帮忙确认判断地震是这题吗?

62#
发表于 2008-7-3 20:30:00 | 只看该作者

请问鸟学飞的那篇是GWD的这篇吗? (树栖论被否定,而疾走论被赞成)

拜托LZ、NN门帮确认看看,感激不尽!

GWD27-Q 3 to Q6:

Two opposing scenarios, the “arboreal” hypothesis and the “cursorial” hypothesis, have traditionally been put forward concerning the origins of bird flight. The “arboreal” hypothesis holds that bird ancestors began to fly by climbing trees and gliding down from branches with the help of incipient feathers: the height of trees provides a good starting place for launching flight, especially through gliding. As feathers became larger over time, flapping flight evolved and birds finally became fully air-borne. This hypothesis makes intuitive sense, but certain aspects are troubling. Archaeopteryx (the earliest known bird) and its maniraptoran dinosaur cousins have no obviously arboreal adaptations, such as feet fully adapted for perching. Perhaps some of them could climb trees, but no convincing analysis has demonstrated how Archaeopteryx would have both climbed and flown with its forelimbs, and there were no plants taller than a few meters in the environments where Archaeopteryx fossils have been found. Even if the animals could climb trees, this ability is not synonymous with gliding ability. (Many small animals, and even some goats and kangaroos, are capable of climbing trees but are not gliders.) Besides, Archaeopteryx shows no obvious features of gliders, such as a broad membrane connecting forelimbs and hind limbs.

   The “cursorial”(running) hypothesis holds that small dinosaurs ran along the ground and stretched out their arms for balance as they leaped into the air after insect prey or, perhaps, to avoid predators. Even rudimentary feathers on forelimbs could have expanded the arm’s surface area to enhance lift slightly. Larger feathers could have increased lift incrementally, until sustained flight was gradually achieved. Of course, a leap into the air does not provide the acceleration produced by dropping out of a tree; an animal would have to run quite fast to take off. Still, some small terrestrial animals can achieve high speeds. The cursorial hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that the immediate theropod dinosaur ancestors of birds were terrestrial, and they had the traits needed for high lift off speeds: they were small, agile, lightly built, long-legged, and good runners. And because they were bipedal, their arms were free to evolve flapping flight, which cannot be said for other reptiles of their time.

63#
发表于 2008-7-3 20:57:00 | 只看该作者
想请问一下,阅读的基金会将已经确认的整理成WORD格式发出来吗?
64#
发表于 2008-7-3 23:10:00 | 只看该作者
还有篇RNA呢?
65#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-3 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Hi_Cynthia在2008-7-3 23:10:00的发言:
还有篇RNA呢?

恩,确实落下了,谢谢提醒

66#
发表于 2008-7-4 04:00:00 | 只看该作者

建议多加一下, lyricsea大狭整理的300题或其他什么的号

可以多些信息.

辛苦整理了, 拜谢!


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-4 5:23:34编辑过]
67#
发表于 2008-7-4 04:40:00 | 只看该作者

还有阅读木几青题分高分区和中等吗? 我怕我只能到中的, 看了高的反而没有


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-7-4 5:02:14编辑过]
68#
发表于 2008-7-4 05:47:00 | 只看该作者
请问magicbaby : 如何找到61楼地震原文? xiexie
69#
发表于 2008-7-4 10:29:00 | 只看该作者
很多基金是没有原文的
70#
发表于 2008-7-4 10:51:00 | 只看该作者
新增加黑洞一题,据大牛说可以看老倌的27那篇作参考。但考试的是加强版,有两屏多的长度
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-26 13:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部