ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1017|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD8-9 政治结构

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-30 17:26:00 | 只看该作者

GWD8-9 政治结构


    

GWD 8- 9

全文如下。我不太懂美国政权结构,上网查了一下还是不太明白。所以下面文章里面的内容看得挺晕,到底是谁和谁在斗争?特别是黄色部分,senate不是HOUSE的两部分之一吗?为什么我看文章的意思是它们是分开的,或者至少house>senate啊?没看明白其中起承转合是怎么回事。

请牛人帮忙讲讲。谢谢!


      In its 1903 decision in the case


    

       of
Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, the United


    

       States
Supreme Court rejected the


    

Line       efforts of three Native American tribes


    

  (5)      to prevent the opening of tribal lands


    

to non-Indian
settlement without tribal


    

consent.  In his study of the Lone


    

Wolf case, Blue Clark properly


    

emphasizes the
Court’s assertion


    

 (10)      of a virtually unlimited unilateral power


    

of Congress (the
House of Represen-


    

tatives and the
Senate) over Native


    

American
affairs.  But he fails to note


    

the decision’s
more far-reaching


    

 (15)      impact: 
shortly after Lone Wolf, the


    

federal
government totally abandoned


    

negotiation and
execution of formal


    

written
agreements with Indian tribes


    

as a
prerequisite for the implemen-


    

 (20)      tation of federal Indian policy.  Many


    

commentators
believe that this change


    

had already
occurred in 1871 when—


    

following a
dispute between the


    

       House
and the Senate over which


    

 (25)      chamber should enjoy primacy in


    

Indian
affairs—Congress abolished


    

the making of
treaties with Native


    

American
tribes.  But in reality the


    

federal
government continued to nego-


    

 (30)      tiate formal tribal agreements past


    

the turn of the
century, treating these


    

documents not as
treaties with sover-


    

       eign
nations requiring ratification by the


    

Senate but simply
as legislation to be


    

 (35)      passed by both houses of Congress.


    

       The
Lone Wolf decision ended this


    

era of formal
negotiation and finally


    

did away with
what had increasingly


    

become the empty
formality of obtain-


    

ing tribal
consent.


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-7 17:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部