大全－D－20旧题重提

alice1880505

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.

(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.

(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.

(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.（D）

(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

看到讨论，携隐MM也回答过，但有一点疑惑，C的答案似乎也说得过去：不是每个房地产商都会参与和从中获利，所以可以推出不是所有从房地产商得到好处的council member都会支持这个plan,从而也就weaken 了题目。

而D总感觉怪怪的，为什么council member从地产商那竞选得到好处，却还与他们的利益相反，在哪也说不过去呀。希望大家不禀赐教

xuyidan1210

C选项只是对原文的再述，“most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan”。

我不理解你所说的“C的答案似乎也说得过去：不是每个房地产商都会参与和从中获利，所以可以推出不是所有从房地产商得到好处的council member都会支持这个plan,从而也就weaken 了题目。”

按照常理，得到好处的COUNCIL MEMBER会投票赞成才对。

再看D选项,虽然让人觉得莫名其妙，但直接否定了上文的常理，所以WEAKEN了。不能以说得过去说不过去做题。ETS说什么你就得相信是什么。

alice1880505

以下是引用alice1880505在2008-6-27 20:58:00的发言：

The city council will certainly vote to approve the new downtown redevelopment plan, despite the objections of environmentalists. After all, most of the campaign contributions received by members of the city council come from real estate development firms, which stand to benefit from the plan.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) Several members of the city council receive sizable campaign contributions from environmental lobbying groups.

(B) Members of the city council are required to report the size and source of each campaign contribution they receive.

(C) Not every real estate development firm in the city will be able to participate in, and profit from, the new downtown redevelopment plan.

(D) The members of the city council have often voted in ways that are opposed to the interests of their campaign contributors.（D）

(E) Some environmentalists have stated that the new downtown redevelopment plan might be environmentally sound if certain minor modifications are made.

看到讨论，携隐MM也回答过，但有一点疑惑，C的答案似乎也说得过去：不是每个房地产商都会参与和从中获利，所以可以推出不是所有从房地产商得到好处的council member都会支持这个plan,从而也就weaken 了题目。

而D总感觉怪怪的，为什么council member从地产商那竞选得到好处，却还与他们的利益相反，在哪也说不过去呀。希望大家不禀赐教

我说说我的逻辑推论：

A：1.委员会成员的竞选赞助大多数来自地产开发公司 2.地产开发公司代表着这个计划的利益

B：城市委员会一定会通过这个新的商区发展计划

A—>B

再看C答案：并不是所有在这个城市的地产公司都能够参与这个新商区发展计划并从中获利。

所以推出：并不是所有委员会的成员—即不同的房地产商利益代表者—都会支持此项计划。因为并非所有人在此项目中都有利益关系，所以不一定所有人都投赞成票。

而D答案委员会成员经常在投票时与他们的竞选赞助人的利益背道而驰，这本身就已经违背了题目的逻辑关系。

所以我认为C是正确答案

上述说了这么多就是请大家帮我分析一下我的逻辑分析在哪里出了问题了，帮我怎样才能多靠近ETS的想法

alice1880505

up