Q22: TTGWD2-Q17:

笨笨可可

 

Q22: TTGWD2-Q17:

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides.  New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt.  Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:重點在the impact on company profits

1. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
               
2. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
               
3. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
               
4. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
               
5.  Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so

对于这里，我很不明白，由于自己的逻辑思维和老美相差很大，所以很痛苦。。唉。。。

A：这里因为说要有impact on profit的话，那么只要有利润的话，成本肯定是一个很大的因素。

B：字面意思还不懂呢，请NN给解答

C环境法规在限制处理废料上面限制了什么？限制的多，就说明成本会大，之所以要换另外一个方法就是因为规则增加了成本。。

D：这2个方法在保存hide上面有多么接近？和利润有关，要是不接近，那么产品会不会好。

E：问PC中的一种化学咚咚是不是和使用盐的化学咚咚是一样有效的保存兽皮的？这怎么一看就是有关的啊？

不理解啊

请帮助

笨笨可可

求助啊

windslow2002

选A

ivyqxx

以下是引用笨笨可可在2008-6-8 5:33:00的发言：
 

Q22: TTGWD2-Q17:

Tanco, a leather manufacturer, uses large quantities of common salt to preserve animal hides.  New environmental regulations have significantly increased the cost of disposing of salt water that results from this use, and, in consequence, Tanco is considering a plan to use potassium chloride in place of common salt.  Research has shown that Tanco could reprocess the by-product of potassium chloride use to yield a crop fertilizer, leaving a relatively small volume of waste for disposal.

In determining the impact on company profits of using potassium chloride in place of common salt, it would be important for Tanco to research all of the following EXCEPT:重點在the impact on company profits

1. What difference, if any, is there between the cost of the common salt needed to preserve a given quantity of animal hides and the cost of the potassium chloride needed to preserve the same quantity of hides?
      
2. To what extent is the equipment involved in preserving animal hides using common salt suitable for preserving animal hides using potassium chloride?
      
3. What environmental regulations, if any, constrain the disposal of the waste generated in reprocessing the by-product of potassium chloride?
      
4. How closely does leather that results when common salt is used to preserve hides resemble that which results when potassium chloride is used?
      
5.  Are the chemical properties that make potassium chloride an effective means for preserving animal hides the same as those that make common salt an effective means for doing so

对于这里，我很不明白，由于自己的逻辑思维和老美相差很大，所以很痛苦。。唉。。。

A：这里因为说要有impact on profit的话，那么只要有利润的话，成本肯定是一个很大的因素。

B：字面意思还不懂呢，请NN给解答

C环境法规在限制处理废料上面限制了什么？限制的多，就说明成本会大，之所以要换另外一个方法就是因为规则增加了成本。。

D：这2个方法在保存hide上面有多么接近？和利润有关，要是不接近，那么产品会不会好。

E：问PC中的一种化学咚咚是不是和使用盐的化学咚咚是一样有效的保存兽皮的？这怎么一看就是有关的啊？

不理解啊

请帮助

重点在impact on company profits,只有E和profits不沾边

B试着解释下：用在用盐保存兽皮的设备多大程度上可以用到用KCl2保存兽皮中？

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-6-11 16:51:25编辑过]

笨笨可可

那怎么看出B是和成本相关的呢？？

ivyqxx

以下是引用笨笨可可在2008-6-11 17:02:00的发言：

那怎么看出B是和成本相关的呢？？

equipment的使用也是成本之一

sedona11

我对d和e还是不能很好的区别……

我总觉得应该选c

有人能帮忙指点一下么？

混乱思维

帮着顶一下！我也觉得是C，GWD的答案是网友选出来的，所以未必就是ETS承认的答案。而自从出了三聚氰胺的毒奶粉，我就更觉得C答案对了。因为法律只管处理SALT,而不管potassium chloride 是否有害，所以企业才不去考虑呢。大家觉得呢？

着急呀，等答案，做逻辑真是痛并“快乐”着。

NOTALOSER

E中，化学属性是否一样，一样不一样又有什么关系呢？化学属性与利润的关系原文没有给出，和profit不沾边，就它了

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-11-22 22:32:39编辑过]

yzhao26

up