GWD17-Q9

zhuceg

好题， 又发现自己读题和理解这种百分比和集合概念问题的漏洞和偏差

tiffany1102

up.

hionekg

同问
                                              

prfdu2005

up

赋格

NOT+WEANKEN是假设，为啥A不对呢

pizzahutgg

...legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts

我觉得选B不对，题目里已经说了撤掉的都是反对党controlled，然后B就是把原文事实又重复了一遍，说不是president party控制的，这不是assumption

E虽然不能直接说明总统不是bias的，但是E确实填补了题目的一个逻辑链条。