大全-12-9,大全-12-10

Energy

9.  In 1990 all of the people who applied for a job at Evco also applied for a job at Radeco, and Evco and Radeco each offered jobs to half of these applicants. Therefore, every one of these applicants must have been offered a job in 1990.
The argument above is based on which of the following assumptions about these job applicants?
(A) All of the applicants were very well qualified for a job at either Evco or Radeco.
(B) All of the applicants accepted a job at either Evco or Radeco.
(C) None of the applicants was offered a job by both Evco and Radeco.
(D) None of the applicants had applied for jobs at places other than Evco and Radeco.
(E) None of the applicants had previously worked for either Evco or Radeco
好像AB看上去也可以

Energy

10.    The geese that gather at the pond of a large corporation create a hazard for executives who use the corporate helicopter, whose landing site is 40 feet away from the pond. To solve the problem, the corporation plans to import a large number of herding dogs to keep the geese away from the helicopter.
Which of the following, if a realistic possibility, would cast the most serious doubt on the prospects for success of the corporation’s plan?
(A) The dogs will form an uncontrollable pack.
(B) The dogs will require training to learn to herd the geese.
(C) The dogs will frighten away foxes that prey on old and sick geese.
(D) It will be necessary to keep the dogs in quarantine for 30 days after importing them.
(E) Some of the geese will move to the pond of another corporation in order to avoid being herded by the dogs.
E和D为什么不对

Energy

答案9，C 10 A

qww

10.答案是A，因为The dogs will form an uncontrollable pack.
狗的引入将形成一个不可控制的一群。就是把鹅赶跑了来了狗。
It will be necessary to keep the dogs in quarantine for 30 days after importing them。D的意思是狗在引入后需要进行30的检疫隔离。无关选项。
Some of the geese will move to the pond of another corporation in order to avoid being herded by the dogs.
一些鹅将去其它公司的池塘来avoid being herded by the dogs.
这里文章中没有说其它公司有直升机。 就算有也无妨，因为是针对success of 『the 』corporation’s plan的提问

qww

9。答案是C无疑，因为ETS的思路如此。但A,B为什么不行，我认为主要是结论这句话every one of these applicants must have been offered a job in 1990。注意用的是have been offened a Job.并没有说每个人own or take 等词。所以针对的是提供机会，不是机会的获得。
个人理解，不敢十分肯定。继续讨论。

海海

9.  in 1990 all of the people who applied for a job at evco also applied for a job at radeco, and evco and radeco each offered jobs to half of these applicants. therefore, every one of these applicants must have been offered a job in 1990.
the argument above is based on which of the following assumptions about these job applicants?
(a) all of the applicants were very well qualified for a job at either evco or radeco.
(b) all of the applicants accepted a job at either evco or radeco.
(c) none of the applicants was offered a job by both evco and radeco.
(d) none of the applicants had applied for jobs at places other than evco and radeco.
(e) none of the applicants had previously worked for either evco or radeco

A 扯到了qualify这个题干根本就没涉及的问题 - 不是已经说了evco and radeco each offered jobs to half of these applicants吗? qualify不qualify关他屁事! 典型的irrelevant.

B 扯到了accept的事, 题干从头到尾都在谈的是offer. 问题问的也是说需要什么样的假设, 可以让every one of these applicants must have been offered a job in 1990这个结论成立. accept不accept是他个人的事了.  不妨这样考虑, 即使所有的人都没accept工作, 人家给他offer这件事是不能否认的, 不能说没接受然后offer这事就受到影响了吧.  还是irrelevant.

C.(c) none of the applicants was offered a job by both evco and radeco. 对了. 如果有一人两边都给了offer, 那必然有一个人得不到offer了.

海海

10.答案是A，因为The dogs will form an uncontrollable pack.
狗的引入将形成一个不可控制的一群。就是把鹅赶跑了来了狗。
It will be necessary to keep the dogs in quarantine for 30 days after importing them。D的意思是狗在引入后需要进行30的检疫隔离。无关选项。
Some of the geese will move to the pond of another corporation in order to avoid being herded by the dogs.
一些鹅将去其它公司的池塘来avoid being herded by the dogs.
这里文章中没有说其它公司有直升机。 就算有也无妨，因为是针对success of 『the 』corporation’s plan的提问

同意. 一点补充. B很有迷惑性, 我就差一点选B了. B和D在性质上是一样的. 排除了B就排除D. 反之亦然. 我这样想的, 检疫要30天, 那培训也要时间(可能还要培训员等, 但不用多想了),这不是一回事吗?  

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-1-4 1:17:17编辑过]

小女公子

以下是引用海海在2004-1-4 1:04:00的发言：
9.  in 1990 all of the people who applied for a job at evco also applied for a job at radeco, and evco and radeco each offered jobs to half of these applicants. therefore, every one of these applicants must have been offered a job in 1990.
the argument above is based on which of the following assumptions about these job applicants?
(a) all of the applicants were very well qualified for a job at either evco or radeco.
(b) all of the applicants accepted a job at either evco or radeco.
(c) none of the applicants was offered a job by both evco and radeco.
(d) none of the applicants had applied for jobs at places other than evco and radeco.
(e) none of the applicants had previously worked for either evco or radeco

A 扯到了qualify这个题干根本就没涉及的问题 - 不是已经说了evco and radeco each offered jobs to half of these applicants吗? qualify不qualify关他屁事! 典型的irrelevant.

可是我觉得，如果不ｑｕａｌｉｆｙ，又怎么能够拿到工作呢？？我觉得是不是ｖｅｒｙ　ｗｅｌｌ出了问题？每个人都合格是可以的，但每个人都非常合格就有点问题了。

如果去掉ｗｅｌｌ，Ａ能否备选呢？

我只是很在意，在ｅｔｓ的思路中，得到ｏｆｆｅｒ和ＱＵＡＬＩＦＹ是不是可得默认推导的。毕竟人家的聘用制度不像国内那么多黑幕、关系什么的……

请教……

谢谢

小女公子

up

小女公子

up