ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3168|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 17-Q9真诚求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-5-6 11:39:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 17-Q9真诚求教

 GWD17-Q9:
        
CD-9 Q10

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

A.      Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.

B.      The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

C.      The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.

D.      The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.

E.       Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

总统秘书以非党派人士所持被cancel project是浪费的报告为依据,申明外界认为总统此举是对立马机构大本营为报复性措施的指责,是没有理由的..题目问,秘书该agrument的assumption是什么?

答案是B.说计划中的项目被认定为浪费不占总统政党所在选区项目中的大多数,

可这个和秘书的assumption我看不出有什么关系阿

请NN指教

沙发
发表于 2008-5-6 16:26:00 | 只看该作者
The scheduled highway projects = the highway projects that are scheduled to be constructed,not to be concelled.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-6 22:38:00 | 只看该作者

还是不解阿..LS得gg能不能说的详细些阿..

郁闷坏了...

地板
发表于 2008-5-6 23:40:00 | 只看该作者

B.The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.

就是说在报告中认定为浪费钱的,但是却被批准要实施的项目大部分都不在总统控制的地区。

如果取反,就说明总统的反对不是依据预算,而是其它目的了。比如说出于报复。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-5-7 23:03:00 | 只看该作者

非常感谢..

现在也的确明白newyearagain所说的那句话了..还是没有正确理解表达意思...

非常谢谢两位GG

6#
发表于 2009-4-6 20:59:00 | 只看该作者
我也有问题
7#
发表于 2009-4-27 23:13:00 | 只看该作者

还是不明白啊,为什么选B啊?


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-27 23:17:38编辑过]
8#
发表于 2009-4-29 00:39:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 07:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部