以下是引用pcpcpcpcpc在2008-5-8 22:44:00的发言:唉,两位都太表面了。 wwwcom说的辛苦,呵呵,辛苦的东西不是人人都愿意去做的,虽然说这样的辛苦有一定的回报,不过我本来80K就够了,为什么还有这么多人说要辛苦点呢。 学费,如果比80K的每年多还40K,还要多还3年,虽然以后的工资比80K的高,但回到上面,80K够了,为什么要死命的去赚120K呢。 daffi mm说的being part of justice,给你看看boston legal里的一段话:(红字部分) Sally Heep: Do you care about me, Alan? Alan Shore: I care a great deal for you. That's why I'm going to give you some very sound advice. Run. Sally Heep: What? Alan Shore: This is a bad business. It is an often filthy, dehumanizing, mean-spirited job. I assure you I take no pleasure in it. It just comes easily to me. But…you… are not that way. So I suggest you think long and hard about whether you really wanna wake up every morning with all the promise that morning conveys and come here. Which I say to you only because I care. Sally Heep: You are such a liar. Pretending that this stuff doesn't affect you. That you can just brush it off. Alan Shore: I'm afraid I can. 的确,有少数人会为了法学院更有挑战性而申请,但我不认为会有那么多,我期待的答案是比如以后能当美国总统什么的,呵呵,just kidding,但的确,yale有好几位美国总统,这样的东西才是有吸引力的。 我没弄明白, 你想问的到底是什么? 是自己为什么应该上法学院, 还是别人为什么想上法学院? 如果是后者, WHY BOTHER CARE? 你说的没错, LAW IS A FILTHY JOB. 我说的也没错, 在这个FILTHY JOB里, ONE WOULD OCCATIONALLY FEEL BEING PART OF JUSTICE. 这是一个硬币的两面. 你很在乎别人看到的是哪一面么? BTW, 这个 J.D THING 跟美国总统有什么关系?! 就算 J.D 从政的比例较大, J.D 是必要条件么? GEORGE W. BUSH 就是 HBS MBA. 退一步说, MILITARY EXPERIENCE 对竞选美国总统也总是很有用的, 也"更有挑战性", 你觉得有多少中国学生会因此立志去美国参军? ---------"这样的东西才是有吸引力的", 是对你有吸引力, 还是对GENERAL CHINESE LAW SCHOOL STUDENTS有吸引力啊? 有多少 CHINESE J.D 毕业后在美国从政啊, 麻烦给个数据. |