ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2657|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

好难的一个阅读类型的题目啊!!!大于700难度

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-31 16:24:00 | 只看该作者

好难的一个阅读类型的题目啊!!!大于700难度

Passage 3

Joseph Glatthaar's Forged in Battle is not the first excellent study of Black soldiers and their White officers in the Civil War, but it uses more soldiers' letters and diaries-including rare material from Black soldier-and concentrates more intensely on Black-White relations in Black regiments than do any of its predecessors. Glatthaar's title expresses his thesis: loyalty, friendship, and respect among White officers and Black soldiers were fostered by the mutual dangers they faced in combat.
Glatthaar accurately describes the government's discriminatory treatment of Black soldiers in pay, promotion, medical care, and job assignments, appropriately emphasizing the campaign by Black soldiers and their officers to get the opportunity to fight. That chance remained limited through out the war by army policies that kept most Black units serving in rear-echelon assignments and working in labor battalions. Thus, while their combat death rate was only one- third that of while units, their mortality rate from disease, a major killer in this war, was twice as great. Despite these obstacles, the courage and effectiveness of several Black units in combat won increasing respect from initially skeptical or hostile White soldiers. As one White officer put it, "they have fought their way into the respect of all the army."(Line25) In trying to demonstrate the magnitude of this attitudinal change, however, Glatthaar seems to exaggerate the prewar racism of the White men who became officers in Black regiments." Prior to the war," He writes of these men, "virtually all of them held powerful racial prejudices." While perhaps true of those officers who joined Black units for promotion or other self-serving motives, this statement misrepresents the attitudes of the many abolitionists who became officers in Black regiments. Having spent years fighting against the race prejudice endemic in American society, they participated eagerly in this military experiment, which they hope would help African Americans achieve freedom and postwar civil equality. By current standards of racial egalitarianism, these men's paternalism toward African Americans was racist. But to call their (Line40) feelings "powerful racial prejudices" is to indulge in generational chauvinism-to judge past eras by present standards.

7. Which of the following best describes the kind of error attributed to Glatthaar in lines 25-28?
(A) Insisting on an unwarranted distinction between two groups of individuals in order to render an argument concerning them internally consistent
(B) Supporting an argument in favor of a given interpretation of a situation with evidence that is not particularly relevant to the situation
(C) Presenting a distorted view of the motives of certain individuals in order to provide grounds for a negative evaluation of their actions
(D) Describing the conditions prevailing before a given event in such a way that the contrast with those prevailing after the event appear more striking than it actually is(E) Asserting that a given event is caused by another event merely because the other event occurred before the given event occurred

答案是D,这个题目我觉得挺难的,也挺考技巧的和思维的。这个题目如果研究透了,估计这一类型的新题都没有问题了,高手给些意见,并翻译一下D好吗?谢谢大家哦,给些这个题做的思路



沙发
发表于 2003-12-31 23:04:00 | 只看该作者
D选项: 用一种方法描述在某件事情发生之前的普遍状况, 致使在这件事之后的相对状况比实际发生的要显得更加突出.(翻译的很ugly, 不要见怪.)

意思我懂,就是表达不清楚,象茶壶里煮饺子.意思是说: 文章作者批评G的一个写法: 为了使白人军官对黑人的态度转变看起来更加突出, 在描述这种转变之前的白人对黑人的种族歧视的时候, 特别夸张了这种歧视.

不当之处, 还请大家指正!
板凳
发表于 2013-10-22 19:49:34 | 只看该作者
我想知道C选项错在哪里了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-17 00:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部