|
Firstly, a compelling flaw in the reasoning line is that the press company rests on the assumption that lack of creativity causes the high rate of labor flowing. However, no convincing evidence in this argument is stated to support this assumption. In fact, it is more likely that other factors may cause the results, such as low salaries or discomfortable working condition. Secondly, the solution proposed by the press company is based on the unjustified assumption that high-technology is sufficient to give birth to increase employees' creativity, thus elevating the rate of losing labor.Nevertheless, if it turns out that keeping people work in this company is due to a combination of factors such as more concers about their family from the employers and increasing morale to bond together, only high-technology is not absolutely enough to lead the previous expected consequence. Finally, the author unjustifiably commits a fallacy of false analogy in assuming that the stratigies from a editor in Children Press are also applicable to the Watchweek Press. However, the differences between these two clearly outweigh the similarities, thus making this analogy much less valid. For example,.....(sorry，因为我不知道原题的真正完整题目，所以我不知道这个W press是个什么性质的，所以没有办法举例。)  | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2008-4-25 20:16:00
楼主