ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2348|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD25-Q26.A答案更合理?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-3-28 03:57:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]GWD25-Q26.A答案更合理?

   

GWD25-Q25 to 28


    

     In mid-February 1917 a women’s movement
independent of political affiliation erupted in New York
City
, the stronghold of the Socialist party in the United states.
Protesting against the high cost of living, thousands of women refused to buy
chickens, fish, and vegetables. The boycott shut down much of the City’s
foodstuffs marketing for two weeks, riveting public attention on the issue of
food prices, which had increased partly as a result of increased exports of
food to Europe that had been occurring since
the outbreak of the First World War.


    

By early 1917 the
Socialist party had established itself as a major political presence in New York City. New York
Socialists, whose customary spheres of struggle were electoral work and trade
union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive
series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women’s movement
toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists’ brief commitment to
cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. While
some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most
Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative
channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through
which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or organizing
was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and
similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States
society one step closer to socialism.


    

Although New York’s Socialists
saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best, secondary or tertiary to the real
task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest
movement out of an
urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living
issue
. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by
rising food prices drove these women to protest. Consumer organizing spoke directly
to their daily lives and concerns; they saw cheaper food as a valuable end in
itself. Food price protests were these women’s way of organizing at their own
workplace, as workers whose occupation was shopping and preparing food for their
families.


    

Q26


    

It can be inferred from the passage that the
goal

        
of the boycotting
women was the


    

A.   
achievement
of an immediate economic

        
outcome


    

B.   
development
of a more socialistic society


    

C.   
concentration
of widespread consumer

        
protests on the more
narrow issue of food prices


    

D.   
development
of one among a number of different approaches that the women

        
wished to employ in combating the high
        
cost of living.


    

E.    
attraction
of more public interest to issues

        
that
the women and the New York
socialists

        
considered important.


    

 



参考答案是C,我认为正确答案是A。
见红字部分,运动的目的就是要解决生活费用高的经济问题。
C答案中:concentration
of widespread consumer

    
protests只是运动引起的一个后果,而不是运动的目的(goal).

沙发
发表于 2008-6-15 13:03:00 | 只看该作者

为什么我的参考资料上正确答案是D??

板凳
发表于 2008-8-2 23:20:00 | 只看该作者
同问 这篇很困惑答案的定位
地板
发表于 2008-9-11 16:40:00 | 只看该作者
A
5#
发表于 2009-4-3 16:44:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-TN-24上给的答案也是C,我选A,women的目标不是concentration..

大家都选A么?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-17 15:42
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部