這篇我一直覺得很納悶 一開始R說before colonialism: age>gender (generally in Africa),之後的研究他發現overgeneralized,而他的發現是in Kenyan gerder>age。然而這發現的最後一句我覺得很怪 since age apparently remained the overriding principle of social organization in central Kenyasince,所以是說在Kenyan,age還是比較有影響力的嗎? 之後,他修改他的觀點:age was a primary principle...那這一句不就又回到之前他還未觀察Kenyan的情形時說的一樣嗎?還是age>gender啊?? -- by 会员 young99 (2008/12/17 17:42:00)
发现相同疑问,原来的theory是precolanial age>gender,after colonial gender>age.研究是kenyan precolanial已经是gender>age,除非一些seniors who have authority作为特例。那修正后的观点到底是什么? |