ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Press Secretary: Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties. They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts. But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors. So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

正确答案: B

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2082|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]一道GWD逻辑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-1-20 19:47:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]一道GWD逻辑

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

  1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
  2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
  3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
  4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
  5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

答案B,我知道只有选B,可还是不明白,不知如何理解,哪位高手解读一下?

沙发
发表于 2008-1-20 21:53:00 | 只看该作者
按照GWD方法,cd和直接淘汰,a因为not the only表达不清直接淘汰,所以只比较be,对比原文b的相关性大于e。
板凳
发表于 2008-1-21 00:17:00 | 只看该作者
The president has cancelled some highway projects. Some critics alleged that the president did this to punish the opposition parties because 90% of these cancelled projects were located in the opposition parties' legislative districts. However, the cancelled projects were identified as wasteful in a report by nonpartisan auditors. Thus, the president did this not because of politics but because of economics.

Two different groups of projects: the group of projects which have been cancelled by the president(GC); the other which were identified as wasteful in the auditors' report(GW). The relationship between GC and GW: GC belongs to GW. GW can be divided into two categories in terms of politics: those located in the president's districts (GWP)and those located in the opposition parties' districts(GWO). According to the same standard, GC can be divided into GCP and GCO.
Now we've already known GCP:GCO=1/9
B means that GWP:GWO <or= 5:5 If we negative B, we have GWP:GWO >or=5:5.

地板
发表于 2008-1-23 18:07:00 | 只看该作者

试试not+weaken方法吧

如果加上否定,那么大部分高速都建在总统选区,自然削弱了文中论断。因为总统不再公正。所以选B吧~~

不知对不对,还望斟酌。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 07:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部