北美二战娘子军

justoneway

昏天昏地看了两天movie,上来看姐妹们都这么勤奋，惭愧惭愧，每次俺老是叮嘱自己抓紧时间，可每次还老是不自觉，请广大的战友们以后多多监督，呵呵。

许仙

我发现虽然我做对了，但是经过英台的指点，觉得思路还是不够透彻，现在终于彻底明白了，请大家看我写的解释。

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

先翻译一下：长时间接触动物的人会经常得动物过敏，有的还很厉害。在一个对现有主要动物园的员工的调查中，30%的有这种过敏现象。根据这个例子，专家得出结论说，在普通人口中（不在动物园工作的人口中），那些同样长时间和动物接触的人得过敏的百分比不是30%而是比30%更多。

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion? 问支持

A.    A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.得了严重过敏的动物园员工很有可能换其他职业 直接支持，因为动物园辞职的人回到普通人里，增加了普通人得过敏的比例

B.    A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home

       动物园的员工比普通的人更可能在家里养1个或多个宠物 无关，题干里没有提到家养。

C.    The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small. 总人口中对动物的接触率与动物园员工的接触率相比要少。 削弱，如果是quite big就是支持了。

D.   Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos. 总体来说，与家养的动物接触和与动物园的动物接触相比较，得过敏的几率低 无关

E.    Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.动物园的员工接触动物时很少穿劳保服。无关

[此贴子已经被作者于2008-4-7 13:06:39编辑过]

lenaqian

以下是引用许仙在2008-4-7 8:16:00的发言：

看语法讨论贴，得到一些引导原因状语连词的用法，分享给姐妹们：

1.  as and since:

As  and  since  are used when the reason is already known to the listener/reader, or when it is not the most important part of the sentence.  As - and   since - clauses  often come at the beginning of sentences.  often come at the beginning of sentences.

As it's raining again, we'll have to stay at home.
Since he had not paid his bill, his electricity was cut off.

As - and since - clauses  are relatively formal; in an informal style, the same ideas are often expressed with  so.
It's raining again, so  we'll have to stay at home.

2.  because:

Because  puts more emphasis on the reason, and most often introduces new information which is not known to the listener/reader.
Because I was ill for six months, I lost my job.

When the reason is the most important part of the sentence, the because - clause  usually comes at the end.  It can also stand alone.  Since and as  cannot be used like this.
Why am I leaving?  I'm leaving because I'm fed up  !   (NOT..... I'm leaving  as/since I'm fed up!)
"Why are you laughing? "    "Because  you look so funny".

A because - clause  can be used at the end of a sentence to say how one knows something  can be used at the end of a sentence to say how one knows something.
You didn't tell me the truth, because I found the money in your room.  ( = .... I know because I found....)

3.  for :

For introduces new information, but suggests that the reason is given as an afterthought.  A for - clause could almost be in brackets.  For - clauses never come at the beginning of sentences, and cannot stand alone never come at the beginning of sentences, and cannot stand alone.  For, used in this sense, is most common in a formal written style.
I decided to stop and have lunch - for I was feeling hungry.

4.  in that:（ETS不喜欢in that）

used after a statement to begin to explain in what way it is true
I've been lucky in that  I have never had to worry about money.

lenaqian

以下是引用许仙在2008-4-7 12:17:00的发言：

我发现虽然我做对了，但是经过英台的指点，觉得思路还是不够透彻，现在终于彻底明白了，请大家看我写的解释。

People who have spent a lot of time in contact with animals often develop animal-induced allergies, some of them quite serious. In a survey of current employees in major zoos, about 30 percent had animal-induced allergies. Based on this sample, experts conclude that among members of the general population who have spent a similarly large amount of time in close contact with animals, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is not 30 percent but substantially more.

先翻译一下：长时间接触动物的人会经常得动物过敏，有的还很厉害。在一个对现有主要动物园的员工的调查中，30%的有这种过敏现象。根据这个例子，专家得出结论说，在普通人口中（不在动物园工作的人口中），那些同样长时间和动物接触的人得过敏的百分比不是30%而是比30%更多。

Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest grounds for the experts’ conclusion? 问支持

A.    A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation.得了严重过敏的动物园员工很有可能换其他职业 直接支持，因为动物园辞职的人回到普通人里，增加了普通人得过敏的比例

B.    A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home

       动物园的员工比普通的人更可能在家里养1个或多个宠物 无关，题干里没有提到家养。

C.    The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small. 总人口中对动物的接触率与动物园员工的接触率相比要少。 削弱，如果是quite big就是支持了。

D.   Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos. 总体来说，与家养的动物接触和与动物园的动物接触相比较，得过敏的几率低 无关

E.    Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care.动物园的员工接触动物时很少穿劳保服。无关

同意。

这题ＧＷＤ里出过两次，一次考支持，一次考削弱。但是方向是一样的。

我一开始没明白swith to的意思，知道是转行的意思之后，此题就开朗了。

usababy

汗, 我是知道转行的意思, 才把他给否定掉的
然后就找不出正确答案来了.
真是感谢大家的讨论
发现这样大家一起讨论好有意思
我不会从这时起才开始喜欢上逻辑吧

先汗

usababy

版上的NN真多啊
动不动就是760, 770
我是搞个670, 就谢天谢地谢太阳了

许仙

一早起来就看到770的牛，我还有2个礼拜，今天开始做数学JJ了。

今天的计划：

做20道逻辑，搞明白了要。

25道SC，总结完。

数学JJ,

再就是，最头疼的阅读。。。

zy39063

上午做SC做是我都快睡着啦，生物钟到现在还没调过来，苦啊

不过，一上来看到姐妹们的讨论马上来了精神，先留言再慢慢看看，嘿嘿

另外：BABY，G考可是个体力活，你今天不能太拼啦，保持好的精力对发挥很重要哦！

zy39063

刚看了许M儿的解释，狂顶，太透彻啦！！俺这样的笨笨就需要这样详细的，带中文的解释

大家多讨论啊，这方法真好，赞一个

usababy

是啊. 真是个体力活. 我都不知道能不能坚持4小时作战, 怕到后面就腰酸背痛啊

前天晚上没睡好, 昨天就稀里糊涂了一天. 昨晚睡好点, 今天状态就好些

现在发现可能好好吃透GWD的阅读和CR, 对这两样就够了. 材料不用多, 感觉到家了就行
刚才还在想, 我二战的时候就好好研究GWD的这两个. 再加PREP, 白勇, 和OG的SC
你们加油做啊, 我这次根本来不及把GWD做完了. 只好下次了