我不是牛人,这题我也花了很多时间,我把我最后想清楚的贴上来。
trade embargo => intl accord + no goods entering or leaving
A the balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade balance和favor错,文中没有这样的暗示 B as long as international opinion is unanimously against patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed. intl accord => trade embargo 违背原文 C a naval blockade of patria’s port would ensure that no goods enter or leave patria. 重复文章的话 D any trade embargo against patria would be likely to fail at some time 因为intl accord和blockade是矛盾的,所以D正确;原文用likely,D选项也用了likely,非绝对化 E for a blockade of patia’s port to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous blockage => intl accord,违背原文,因为原文说:blockade和intl accord矛盾,互相没有推理关系 |