ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2334|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-101 (not in og10)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-1-9 15:26:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-101 (not in og10)

OG11-101

For a trade embargo against a particular country to succeed,a high degree of both international accord and ability  to prevent goods from entering or leaving that country must be sustained . a total blockade of Patria’s ports is necessary to an embargo,but such an action would be likely to cause international discord over the embargo

Most strongly support which of the following conclusions.

A the balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade

B as long as international opinion is unanimously against patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.

C a naval blockade of patria’s port would ensure that no goods enter or leave patria.

D any trade embargo against patria would be likely to fail at some time

E for a blockade of patia’s port to be successful,international opinion must be unanimous

the answer is d.

can anyone explain it ?


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-1-9 15:47:13编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-1-9 16:21:00 | 只看该作者

自己顶 希望有人帮我解答。大家讨论

我发现og11后面有几道题目难度很高,大家感觉到吗?还是我做题不如以前阿?

板凳
发表于 2008-1-10 07:05:00 | 只看该作者

需要两个条件才能让embargo有效,1)国际社会一致认同 2)有效封锁该国.

第二个条件可以做到, 但是做到得同时, 会让国际社会对embargo出现不一致得态度, 问支持啥:

所以支持embargo可能不能有效得实施.

地板
发表于 2008-7-4 22:30:00 | 只看该作者
我也觉得11后面的题目挺难的,是11新加的,之前的讨论也很少。。希望有多点NN的帮助。
5#
发表于 2008-8-10 00:33:00 | 只看该作者

我不是牛人,这题我也花了很多时间,我把我最后想清楚的贴上来。

trade embargo => intl accord + no goods entering or leaving

A the balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade 

  balance和favor错,文中没有这样的暗示

B as long as international opinion is unanimously against patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.

  intl accord => trade embargo 违背原文

C a naval blockade of patria’s port would ensure that no goods enter or leave patria.

  重复文章的话

D any trade embargo against patria would be likely to fail at some time

  因为intl accord和blockade是矛盾的,所以D正确;原文用likely,D选项也用了likely,非绝对化

E for a blockade of patia’s port to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous

  blockage => intl accord,违背原文,因为原文说:blockade和intl accord矛盾,互相没有推理关系

6#
发表于 2008-8-24 06:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用rattledrum在2008-8-10 0:33:00的发言:

我不是牛人,这题我也花了很多时间,我把我最后想清楚的贴上来。

trade embargo => intl accord + no goods entering or leaving

A the balance of opinion is likely to favor Patria in the event of a blockade 

  balance和favor错,文中没有这样的暗示

B as long as international opinion is unanimously against patria, a trade embargo is likely to succeed.

  intl accord => trade embargo 违背原文

C a naval blockade of patria’s port would ensure that no goods enter or leave patria.

  重复文章的话

D any trade embargo against patria would be likely to fail at some time

  因为intl accord和blockade是矛盾的,所以D正确;原文用likely,D选项也用了likely,非绝对化

E for a blockade of patia’s port to be successful, international opinion must be unanimous

  blockage => intl accord,违背原文,因为原文说:blockade和intl accord矛盾,互相没有推理关系

相当同意。这道题目做得我汹涌澎湃。
7#
发表于 2008-10-3 15:43:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢。看了几个帖子,您解释得最清楚!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 15:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部