28－3－17

番茄炒蛋

17. Parents who wish to provide a strong foundation for the musical ability of their children should provide them with a good musical education. Since formal instruction is often a part a good musical education, parents who wish to provide this strong foundation need to ensure that their children receive formal instruction.

The reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it fails to that

(A) parents might not be the only source of a child's musical education

(B) some children might not be interested in receiving a strong foundation for their musical ability

(C) there are many examples of people with formal instruction whose musical ability is poor

(D) formal instruction might not always be a part of a good musical education

(E) some children might become good musicians even if they have not had good musical educations
答案是d
可是我觉得e好像才是最合适的啊，怎么回事呢

sunhx

我的理解是:
e是反着说的,一些孩子没有良好的教育也可能成为音乐家.但它可没说,受到良好的教育的孩子没有成为音乐家.
d的意思更贴近,正规教育不一定是良好音乐培养的一部分.
不知理解的对不对.

番茄炒蛋

嗯，懂了
应该是d更好一些，因为它说的话在原文可以找到直接相对应的
呵呵，谢谢

weiyu

本题讨论的是：

strong foundation for musical ability-->good music education-->formal instruction

E说是good musician 这是out of scope

D注意到了原文的ofen (formal instruction is a part of good music education)

番茄炒蛋

呵呵，承蒙斑竹厚爱，把我刚入门的帖子翻了出来，呵呵，好久不看都忘记咯

weiyu

fanqie,你的逻辑水平很高，请问是不是已经考完了．我觉得你好像好早就完成LSAT了，而且有一定研究．真N

番茄炒蛋

哎呀，呵呵，真是不好意思

大家一起讨论嘛，brony的逻辑也很棒的呢，原来有些题和他争的面红耳赤的

snow_mountain

番茄，你也不赖呀。你是不是考完啦？好像好久没看你在逻辑区出没嘛。

番茄炒蛋

呵呵，考的一般吧，看看，你都成斑竹咯，我们好像还是差不多时候出山的吧

哪个板的啊，有空去给你捧场