28－3－10

番茄炒蛋

10. Tires maybe either underinflated, overinflated, or neither. We are pretty safe in assuming that underinflation or overinflation of tires harms their underinflation or overinflation of tires harms their tread. After all, no one has been able to show that these do not harm tire tread.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument抯 reasoning?

(A) The argument assumes what it attempting to demonstrate.

(B) The argument overlooks that what is not in principle susceptible to proof might be false.

(C) The argument fails to specify how it is that underinflation or overinflation harms tire tread.

(D) The argument rejects the possibility that what has not been proven is nevertheless true.

(E) The argument fails to precisely define the terms "underinflation?and "overinflation?

答案是d，原文的意思就没有看懂，大家来帮我看看，谢

sunhx

第二句是不是打错了.应该是We are pretty safe in assuming that underinflation or overinflation of tires harms their tread.
轮胎或者充多,充少了气,或者充的正好.我们可以很有把握的说,充多充少了气会损害轮胎面.毕竟没人能证明这不损害轮胎.
答案d是这个argument否定了没有被证实的事情也可能是对的这种可能性.也就是说:虽没人能证实不损害轮胎,但不等于肯定会损害轮胎.

番茄炒蛋

谢谢小孙，呵呵，