ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2397|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-22-2-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-9 18:46:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-22-2-7

Questions 7-8
Political advocate: Campaigns for elective office
should be subsidized with public funds. One
reason is that this would allow politicians to
devote less time to fund-raising thus giving
campaigning incumbents more time to serve the
public. A second reason is that such subsidies
would make it possible to set caps on individual
campaign contributions. thereby reducing the
likelihood that elected officials will be working
for the benefit not of the public but of
individual large contributors. Critic: This
argument is problematic the more the caps
constrain contributions the more time candidates
have to spend finding more small contributors.
7. The critic objects that the advocate's
argument is flawed because
(A) any resourceful large contributor can
circumvent caps on individual contributions by
sending in smaller amounts under various names
(B) one of the projected results cited in support
of the proposal made is entailed by the other and
therefore does not constitute independent support
of the proposal
(C) of the two projected results cited in support
of the proposal made one works against the other
(D) it overlooks the possibility that large
contributors will stop contributing if they
cannot contribute at will
(E) it overlooks the possibility that incumbents
with a few extremely generous contributors will
be hit harder by caps than incumbents with many
moderately generous contributors.

答案C。

把答案看了三遍后觉得自己死了不明不白。
沙发
发表于 2003-12-9 21:41:00 | 只看该作者
There are two reasons for the the elective office to be subsidized with public funds
1。allow politicians to devote less time to fund-raising thus giving campaigning incumbents more time to serve the public
2。reduce by setting caps on individual campaign contributions the  possibility that elected officialsd works for the benefit of the individual large contributors.

however, according to the critic:the more the caps constrain contributions(2。), the more time candidates have to spend finding more small contributors(1。).

therefore, the two results contradict each other.


板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-9 22:21:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢你,解释的很清楚。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-16 06:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部