ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2174|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-13-2-24

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-7 16:37:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-13-2-24

24. The problem that environmental economics aims
to remedy is the following: people making
economic decisions cannot readily compare
environmental factors, such as clean air and the
survival of endangered species, with other costs
and benefits. As environmental economists
recognize, solving this problem requires
assigning monetary values result from people
comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive
at economic decisions. Thus, environmental
economics is stymied by what motivates it.
If the considerations advanced in its support are
true, the passage’s conclusion is supported
(A) strongly, on the assumption that monetary
values for environment factors cannot be assigned
unless people make economic decisions about these
factors
(B) strongly, unless economic decision-making has
not yet had any effect on the things categorized
as environmental factors
(C) at best weakly, because the passage fails to
establish that economic decision-makers do not by
and large take adequate account of environmental
factors
(D) at best weakly, because the argument assumes
that pollution and other effects on environmental
factors rarely result from economic ecisionmaking
(E) not at all, since the argument is circular,
taking that conclusion as one of its premises

答案A。 没看懂。

Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it. 是怎么推出来的?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-7 19:23:00 | 只看该作者
原文说的是人们作出决定需要知道环境值多少钱
而a中说了,只有当人们作出了决定之后才能确定环境值多少钱
所以a就很好的指出了原文的矛盾之所在咯
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-7 20:44:00 | 只看该作者
see. thanks.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 11:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部