[下载]CR SC全整理（10月）7道原题，27个线索

yanziwendy

thanks!!!

文明

路過，收下附件咯，順便推一下!

 

其實是說：嚴重謝謝樓主妹妹

rain119911

强烈感谢！！！：）

CindyFarer

谢谢lisy噢,漂亮妈妈

chrisf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.         GWD-29-Q28

Astronomer:  Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter’s atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.  Nevertheless, some indication of their size can be inferred from spectrographic analyses of Jupiter’s outer atmosphere.  After the fragments’ entry, these analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur.  The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter’s outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.  Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter’s outer atmosphere without being burned up.

 

In the astronomer’s argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

1. The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the truth of that claim.
2. The first is a claim that the astronomer seeks to show is true; the second provides evidence in support of the truth of that claim.
3. The first and the second are each considerations advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument.
4. The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
5. The first is a circumstance for which the astronomer seeks to provide an explanation; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the explanation provided by the astronomer.

C     

我看到了这道CR的另一个版本，和楼主的不一样唉，请问楼主的那个出处是哪里的，gwd？prep？我翻了一下gwd貌似没有找到：（

chrisf

1.        Astronomer: Observations of the Shoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the comet broke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they did not show how big those fragments were.  In hopes of gaining some indication of the fragments' size, astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outer atmosphere.  These analyses revealed unprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments' entry. The fragments themselves almost certainly contained no sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter's outer atmosphere does contain sulfur.  Since sulfur would have seeped into the outer atmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likely that some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmosphere without being burned up.     In the astronomer's argument, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A)    The first presents a circumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation.

(B)    The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.

(C)    The first acknowledges a consideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that conclusion.

(D)   The first provides evidence in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second acknowledges a consideration that weighs against that conclusion.

(E)    The first is a judgment advanced in support of the conclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.   C

 

这是楼主的这个版本，偶逻辑比较差，死活看不出来为啥要选C，有没有NN讲解一下啊

为什么第一句是against the conclusion of the argument?

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-11-6 21:29:13编辑过]

fatgirl1997

fatgirl1997

俺也觉得那个题选c有点难懂

chrisf

对啊，有没有人来check一下答案啊，我在gwd,prep里面找不到这道题：（

gan4sula

thank you so much