ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4013|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP1 Essay #9 没人问过 求拍~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-11-4 00:03:00 | 只看该作者

PREP1 Essay #9 没人问过 求拍~

请教大牛们:

第31 和32 题

定位在哪里啊?

经常找不到定位。尤其是细节题。>_<

记不住信息点。是不是还是由于对出题思路不敏感造成的啊?

Essay #9.  148      (22549-!-item-!-188;#058&00148-00)

 

In a new book about the antiparty feeling of the early political leaders of the United States, Ralph Ketcham argues that the first six Presidents differed decisively from later Presidents because the first six held values inherited from the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England. In this view, government was designed not to satisfy the private desires of the people but to make them better citizens; this tradition stressed the disinterested devotion of political leaders to the public good.  Justice, wisdom, and courage were more important qualities in a leader than the ability to organize voters and win elections.  Indeed, leaders were supposed to be called to office rather than to run for office.  And if they took up the burdens of public office with a sense of duty, leaders also believed that such offices were naturally their due because of their social preeminence or their contributions to the country.  Given this classical conception of leadership, it is not surprising that the first six Presidents condemned political parties.  Parties were partial by definition, self-interested, and therefore serving something other than the transcendent public good.

 

Even during the first presidency (Washington's), however, the classical conception of virtuous leadership was being undermined by commercial forces that had been gathering since at least the beginning of the eighteenth century.  Commerce--its profit-making, its self-interestedness, its individualism--became the enemy of these classical ideals.  Although Ketcham does not picture the struggle in quite this way, he does rightly see Jackson's tenure (the seventh presidency) as the culmination of the acceptance of party, commerce, and individualism.  For the Jacksonians, nonpartisanship lost its relevance, and under the direction of Van Buren, party gained a new legitimacy.  The classical ideals of the first six Presidents became identified with a privileged aristocracy, an aristocracy that had to be overcome in order to allow competition between opposing political interests.  Ketcham is so strongly committed to justifying the classical ideals, however, that he underestimates the advantages of their decline.  For example, the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties.

 

Question #29.  148-01  (22595-!-item-!-188;#058&000148-01)

 

The passage is primarily concerned with

 

(A) describing and comparing two theories about the early history of the United States

(B) describing and analyzing an argument about the early history of the United States

(C) discussing new evidence that qualifies a theory about the early history of the United States

(D) refuting a theory about political leadership in the United States

(E) resolving an ambiguity in an argument about political leadership in the United States

 

Question #30.  148-02  (22641-!-item-!-188;#058&000148-02)

 

According to the passage, the author and Ketcham agree on which of the following points?

 

(A) The first six Presidents held the same ideas about political parties as did later Presidents in the United States.

(B) Classical ideals supported the growth of commercial forces in the United States.

(C) The first political parties in the United States were formed during Van Buren's term in office.

(D) The first six Presidents placed great emphasis on individualism and civil rights.

(E) Widespread acceptance of political parties occurred during Andrew Jackson's presidency.

 

***Question #31.  148-03   (22687-!-item-!-188;#058&000148-03)

 

It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree that modern views of the freedoms of speech and press are

 

(A) values closely associated with the beliefs of the aristocracy of the early United States

(B) political rights less compatible with democracy and individualism than with classical ideals

(C) political rights uninfluenced by the formation of opposing political parties

(D) values not inherent in the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England

(E) values whose interpretation would have been agreed on by all United States Presidents

 

***Question #32.  148-04   (22733-!-item-!-188;#058&000148-04)

 

Which of the following, if true, provides the LEAST support for the author's argument about commerce and political parties during Jackson's presidency?

 

(A) Many supporters of Jackson resisted the commercialization that could result from participation in a national economy.

(B) Protest against the corrupt and partisan nature of political parties in the United States subsided during Jackson's presidency.

(C) During Jackson's presidency the use of money became more common than bartering of goods and services.

(D) More northerners than southerners supported Jackson because southerners were opposed to the development of a commercial economy.

(E) Andrew Jackson did not feel as strongly committed to the classical ideals of leadership as George Washington had felt.

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-6 23:29:00 | 只看该作者

没人搭理偶

是不是太弱智了?

板凳
发表于 2007-11-7 10:45:00 | 只看该作者

31题是第一句the first six Presidents differed decisively from later Presidents because the first six held values inherited from the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England和最后一句For example, the classical conception of leadership was incompatible with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press,

地板
发表于 2007-11-7 10:52:00 | 只看该作者

32我也不是很确认,只是读下来的通体感觉,因为是supporters of Jackson使得总统这个职务更加商业化的,所以何来的resisted呢?具体还请NN定位

5#
发表于 2007-11-7 21:18:00 | 只看该作者

刚好做了这篇。我的想法是

31题,定位在文章最后一句话说的是modern notion (modern view),推断出classical的观点和modern notion是incompatible。答案要体现不相容,而且要提到比较对象classical conception.

32题,关键是要读懂Jackson是支持commerce的,而commerce是反对classical的这种关系。那他的支持者应该和他一样,支持commerce的所以A是答案。

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-8 21:42:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢两位NN.

我又仔细琢磨了一下32题。NN们帮我看看思路对不对哈:

Which of the following, if true, provides the LEAST support for the author's argument about commerce and political parties during Jackson's presidency?
        

 

Jackson (NO7) 反对classical,支持commerce.问削弱

(A) Many supporters of Jackson resisted the commercialization that could result from participation in a national economy.

他的支持者们反对Commerce.
            

(B) Protest against the corrupt and partisan nature of political parties in the United States subsided during Jackson's presidency.

(C) During Jackson's presidency the use of money became more common than bartering of goods and services.

无比

(D) More northerners than southerners supported Jackson because southerners were opposed to the development of a commercial economy.

无比

(E) Andrew Jackson did not feel as strongly committed to the classical ideals of leadership as George Washington had felt.

支持

7#
发表于 2009-3-22 21:47:00 | 只看该作者

up

8#
发表于 2009-11-5 02:37:44 | 只看该作者

为什么31 # C错?

"***Question #31.  148-03   (22687-!-item-!-188;#058&000148-03)







It can be inferred that the author of the passage would be most likely to agree that modern views of the freedoms of speech and press are







(A) values closely associated with the beliefs of the aristocracy of the early United States



(B) political rights less compatible with democracy and individualism than with classical ideals



(C) political rights uninfluenced by the formation of opposing political parties



(D) values not inherent in the classical humanist tradition of eighteenth-century England
(E) values whose interpretation would have been agreed on by all United States Presidents "
“For example, the classical conception of leadership was incompatible不调和的 with our modern notion of the freedoms of speech and press, freedoms intimately associated with the legitimacy of opposing political parties. ”这句话可否理解为“传统的领导人与现代言论新闻自由的概念是相反的,自由紧密地与反对党派合理性有关”---最后一句话可否递推-有新闻言论自由就不会被反对党派影响?这不是答案C?
引用楼上,借问,问什么C错?
9#
发表于 2011-7-14 20:33:37 | 只看该作者
提示: 该帖被管理员或版主屏蔽
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-13 15:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部