[求助]GWD5-20

icecream1983

    

Q20:

    

Five years ago, as part of a plan to
encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into
savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up
to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is
withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.  Millions of dollars have accumulated in the
special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.

    

    

Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the argument?

    

 

    

1. A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some
        of the money they had invested in the special accounts.
2. Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free
        accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of
        the special savings accounts introduced by the government.
3. The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular
        savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account
        holder.
4. Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily
        been transferring those savings into the special accounts.
5. Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan
        has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

答案是D，我选择的是A。可是为什么呢，还是不明白。
谢谢！

lisy

Ａ只是说有人ｗｉｔｈｄｒａｗ，这个情况肯定会存在的，但是政府的目的是increase the amount of money they put into savings，只要有了increase,就是working了，所以Ａ不能说是ｗｅａｋｅｎ

看Ｄ，说明了一个情况，人们只是把原来存在银行的钱转移了一下，看起来是special accounts的钱多了，但是如果只是从其他的ｓａｖｉｎｇ　ａｃｃｏｕｎｔ转过来的，the amount of money they put into savings的总量可能就没变，所以ｗｅａｋｅｎ了

icecream1983

非常感谢！明白了！!