这道假设题，我郁闷老～

fk305301

Environmentalist:  The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

 

这道题目我实在没搞懂说话者的逻辑是什么，也就做不出题目了，烦请NN帮我解析此题～～～～

Milville business spokesperson:  Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville  in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents.  So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.

 

Environmentalist: I disagree:  A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

 

Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

 

A.       Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances[C1] 

B.       Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome[C2] 

C.       Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means[C3] 

D.     Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it[C4] 

E.      Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people[C5] 

---

 

Winterfish

E.      Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people[C5] 
            

I choose E

I choose E

yexiang2007

我选B

vivian_chi

我也选B，这种题就是很不好做，反驳的是，这件事的负面影响比正面影响要大。

fk305301

偶感觉E似乎好一些，B中Environmentalist始终没有将任何“效益”，只是一味的再否定，desirable outcome 也及不存在了，偶的理解，还请其他朋友指教

crazecat123

我觉得B不对，因为Business Spokespersons是说benefits outweights negative effects, 而不是assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects。

vivian_chi

有没有人可以把b选项和e选项准确的翻译一下？我觉得大家还是对这两个选项的意思没弄明白，我也很糊涂。

Whitney

Keep it as sample as possible.

Environmentalist:    A (The use of snowmobiles) leads to  B (air pollution)
Milville business spokesperson:  A (The use of snowmobiles) leads to C (financial benefit)

Environmentalist:  I disagree:  A does not lead to C

So go to E.      Denying
that an effect ( C) that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a
certain group of people actually benefited those people
                    

fk305301

顶楼上的。不必抠字眼就没那么复杂了，，，谢谢各位！