ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1953|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD-30-Q28

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-10-6 18:38:00 | 只看该作者

请教GWD-30-Q28

In countries where automobile insurance includes compensation for whiplash injuries sustained in automobile accidents, reports of having suffered such injuries are twice as frequent as they are in countries where whiplash is not covered.  Presently, no objective test for whiplash exists, so it is true that spurious reports of whiplash injuries cannot be readily identified.  Nevertheless, these facts do not warrant a conclusion that has been drawn by some commentators:  that in the countries with the higher rates of reported whiplash injuries, half of the reported cases are spurious.  Clearly, in countries where automobile insurance does not include compensation for whiplash, people often have little incentive to report whiplash injuries that they actually have suffered.

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first is a claim that the argument disputes; the second is a conclusion that has been based on that claim.

  2. The first is claim that has been used to support a position that the argument accepts; the second is a position that the argument rejects.

  3. The first is a finding whose accuracy is evaluated in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning the accuracy of the finding.

  4. The first is a finding whose implications are at issue in the argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument concerning one alleged implication.

  5. The first is a finding, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an objection that has been raised against the explanation that the argument defends.

这道题的答案是D。我选的C。

有点不明白,请NN指教。

顺便,whiplash injuries是什么意思啊?金山词霸把这两个词合在一起解释是什么颈椎损伤,单独whiplash又是什么鞭子打的意思,晕死了。

沙发
发表于 2007-10-6 22:57:00 | 只看该作者
做BF题根本不需要去读文章说了什么

你知道知道黑体部分的成分是什么就可以了,是evidence,还是conclusion,是正评价还是负评价

第一个是finding,事实

第二个是这个事实的解读,也就是作者对这个事实的看法

所以选D,a finding whose implications are at issue in this argument; the second is the judgment reached by the argument
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-20 03:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部