ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1299|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11紫色-92题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-10-4 09:54:00 | 只看该作者

OG11紫色-92题

Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors and dictate company policyBecause putting such large amounts of stock 0n the market would only depress its value they could not sell out for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companiesToday, with few exceptionsthe stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions--pension fundsfor example-and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company's stock and from actively influencing a company's decision-makingthey can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations In its valueA minority shareholder is necessarily a short-term traderAs a resultUnited States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits

 Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today's short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow's long-term capitalistic investorsThe legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removedand such institutions encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they investIn addition, any institution that holds 20 percent or more of a company's stock should be forced to give the public one day's notice of the intent to sell those sharesUnless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet andlike the old-time capitalistsmajor investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’  productivitySuch measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest

92  It can be inferred from the passage that which of the following is true of majority shareholders in a corporation?

(A) They make the corporation's operational management decisions

(B) They are not allowed to own more than 50 percent of the corporation's stock

(C) They cannot make quick profits by selling off large amounts of their stock in the corporation

(D) They are more interested in profits than in productivity

(E) They cannot sell any of their stock in the corporation without giving the public advance notice

答案是C.可是我觉得A和E都可以一样。

解释说A

A   While majority shareholders might dictate company policy(1ine 4)there is no suggestion that they would make operational decisions.是否明白说的就不叫SUGGEST?我的理解对吗?

E  Majority shareholders may sell as much stock as they wantthe only constraint they face is the economic one of quickly depressing the share price.我觉得原文中都有这句话了。怎么解释我都不能接受一样。我的理解是,是否原文中指的是如果要卖所有的股份就要通知,而只卖一部分就不一定呢。反正觉得不理解。

请大家帮忙看看

沙发
发表于 2007-10-4 13:16:00 | 只看该作者

A不对
在第一段中Today, with few exceptions,the stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions--pension funds,for example-and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company's stock and from actively influencing a company's decision-making,
反托拉斯法不允许这些机构拥有一家公司大多数股票,不允许他们积极影响公司的决策

后一段中
In addition, any institution that holds 20 percent or more of a company's stock should be forced to give the public one day's notice of the intent to sell those shares,
should be forced是虚拟语气,与现有事实相反.现在不需要事先通知
所以E不对.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-4 13:20:43编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-4 20:29:00 | 只看该作者
哦,恍然大悟啊。谢谢你的帮助。发现自己不仅仅是粗心,还很糊涂啊。
地板
发表于 2007-11-10 00:09:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lydiajiali在2007-10-4 9:54:00的发言:

Most large corporations in the United States were once run by individual capitalists who owned enough stock to dominate the board of directors and dictate company policyBecause putting such large amounts of stock 0n the market would only depress its value they could not sell out for a quick profit and instead had to concentrate on improving the long-term productivity of their companiesToday, with few exceptionsthe stock of large United States corporations is held by large institutions--pension fundsfor example-and because these institutions are prohibited by antitrust laws from owning a majority of a company's stock and from actively influencing a company's decision-makingthey can enhance their wealth only by buying and selling stock in anticipation of fluctuations In its valueA minority shareholder is necessarily a short-term traderAs a resultUnited States productivity is unlikely to improve unless shareholders and the managers of the companies in which they invest are encouraged to enhance long-term productivity (and hence long-term profitability), rather than simply to maximize short-term profits

 Since the return of the old-style capitalist is unlikely, today's short-term traders must be remade into tomorrow's long-term capitalistic investorsThe legal limits that now prevent financial institutions from acquiring a dominant shareholding position in a corporation should be removedand such institutions encouraged to take a more active role in the operations of the companies in which they investIn addition, any institution that holds 20 percent or more of a company's stock should be forced to give the public one day's notice of the intent to sell those sharesUnless the announced sale could be explained to the public on grounds other than anticipated future losses, the value of the stock would plummet andlike the old-time capitalistsmajor investors could cut their losses only by helping to restore their companies’  productivitySuch measures would force financial institutions to become capitalists whose success depends not on trading shares at the propitious moment, but on increasing the productivity of the companies in which they invest

 A minority shareholder is necessarily a short-term trader 在文中的作用是什么?请指教

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-23 08:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部