ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2162|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]Prep-P2-Essay5-question17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-10-3 23:38:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]Prep-P2-Essay5-question17

Essay #5.  189      (21953-!-item-!-188;#058&00189-00)

 

Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States are based on economic status and assume that women's economic status derives from association with men, typically fathers or husbands, and that women therefore have more compelling common interest with men of their own economic class than with women outside it.  Some feminist social scientists, by contrast, have argued that the basic division in American society is instead based on gender, and that the total female population, regardless of economic status, constitutes a distinct class.  Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that in early-nineteenth-century America the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes:  married women, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid domestic work, and none could own property or vote.  Recently, though, other feminist analysts have questioned this model, examining ways in which the condition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women as well as from that of working-class men.  Ann Oakley notes, for example, that the gap between women of different economic classes widened in the late nineteenth century:  most working-class women, who performed wage labor outside the home, were excluded from the emerging middle-class ideal of femininity centered around domesticity and volunteerism.

 

Question #17.  189-03  (22045-!-item-!-188;#058&000189-03)

 

It can be inferred from the passage that the most recent feminist social science research on women and class seeks to do which of the following?

 

(A) Introduce a divergent new theory about the relationship between legal status and gender

(B) Illustrate an implicit middle-class bias in earlier feminist models of class and gender

(C) Provide evidence for the position that gender matters more than wealth in determining class status

(D) Remedy perceived inadequacies of both traditional social science models and earlier feminist analyses of class and gender

(E) Challenge the economic definitions of class used by traditional social scientists

 

答案选D,为什么B不对呢?根据绿色部分,我认为最后这种观点就是反对第二种观点的,但并没有说也反对第一种观点阿,所以我就把D排除了。。 谁能帮我解释一下,谢谢了

沙发
发表于 2007-10-4 15:00:00 | 只看该作者

回复:(yayaangel)[求助]Prep-P2-Essay5-question17...

Hi, if you have OG, I think this is one of the passages in it.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-4 17:47:00 | 只看该作者

Thanks sydneyang.but i can not find this passage either in the OG11-yellow or in the OG11-verbal review. maybe you can give more information? thanks.

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-10-6 10:19:00 | 只看该作者
有人帮我解释一下么?谢谢了
5#
发表于 2007-10-23 22:50:00 | 只看该作者

examining ways in which the condition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women
        

Ann Oakley notes, for example, that the gap between women of different economic classes widened in the late nineteenth century

这2个都是针对论点1“ based on economic status ”的

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-2-4 07:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部