ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually. In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices. Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3895|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【请教】继续PREP-31982-!-item-!-188;#058&005681

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-14 13:32:00 | 只看该作者

【请教】继续PREP-31982-!-item-!-188;#058&005681

?34.
                    
(31982-!-item-!-188;#058&005681)

 

For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Voronia rose by fifteen percent or more annually.  In order to curb these dramatic increases, the ministry of health prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices.  Even though use of prescription drugs did not expand after this price freeze, per capita expenditure for prescription drugs continued to increase by a substantial percentage each year.

 

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why the ministry's action did not achieve its goal?

 

(A) After price increases were prohibited, drug manufacturers concentrated on producing new medications to replace existing products.

(B) The population of Voronia rose steadily throughout the period.

(C) Improvements in manufacturing processes enabled drug manufacturers to maintain high profit levels on drugs despite the price freeze.

(D) In addition to imposing a price freeze, the government encouraged doctors to prescribe generic versions of common drugs instead of the more expensive brand-name versions.

(E) After price increases were prohibited, some foreign manufacturers of expensive drugs ceased marketing them in Voronia.

选A,没思路,哪位nn给解释一下

沙发
发表于 2011-6-17 15:58:39 | 只看该作者
同问!谢谢!
板凳
发表于 2011-6-19 21:23:53 | 只看该作者
上有政策,下有对策.   药厂说你不让涨价,我出新药直接买贵点,不涨价.

别的都无关.
地板
发表于 2011-6-20 16:40:46 | 只看该作者
我觉得楼上讲的有道理。但是问题是,第一个也可以解释为无关,出新药和涨价在逻辑上没有必然联系……感觉题目不是很好。
5#
发表于 2011-6-20 19:48:38 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-568657-1-1.html

和这道一样, GMAT有些逻辑是无条件挂钩的. 出新药就绑定了高价,公司大规模使用就绑定了好用.

ss27要多练这种题.
6#
发表于 2011-6-21 00:27:34 | 只看该作者

谢谢!

恩,受教了!
7#
发表于 2016-8-15 10:12:42 | 只看该作者
一般逻辑题读完题也知道是什么答案了像这种题做的就有点生气,选项的话说得跟放屁一样。都说prohibited drug manufacturers from raising any of their products' prices; new medications 就不是他们的产品了?这跟问为什么政府禁止酒驾了酒驾的比例还是很高呢?我告诉你因为大家喝的是新产品的酒和新产品的车是一样的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 11:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部