ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (PVSU)

00:00:00

Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1627|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG10-31求助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-25 14:37:00 | 只看该作者

OG10-31求助

OG10-第31题:

正确答案是A,为什么是这个答案呢?看Lawyer的总结说是反对结论。

我理解这道题的大致意思应该是:如果私有环保团体能够运营现在由政府运营的国家公园系统。则:目标能更好的实现。


为什么不选B?OG上说B 不正确因为:B indicates the potential for disagreement among various private environmental groups, but it does not suggest that disagreements could not be resolved.没有搞懂也。

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing the national park system, which is now run by the government.

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion above?

A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.

B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.

C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions from major donors and general public.

D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.    

E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.
    


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-25 14:41:01编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-7-25 23:06:00 | 只看该作者

有人认为把国企给私人运营意味着:如果私企能经营和资助由国家运作的国家公园,那么保护的目的就能达到

A说其实那些私企并不能保护好国家公园,而是会开发资源,因为有些要去除一些限制来开发资源的人会加入企业

B说私企不能达成一致来保护国家公园,目的还是保护国家公园的。

和题目要求有区别

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-26 10:36:00 | 只看该作者
啊,明白了。多谢斑斑!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 19:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部