ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Since it has become known that several of a bank's top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank's depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank's financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company's health.

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2894|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问GWD21-28黑脸题,答案是否有问题?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-18 01:20:00 | 只看该作者

再问GWD21-28黑脸题,答案是否有问题?

CD-V-15GWD21-Q28

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved.  They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.  They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health.

 

 

 

 

 

In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

 

 

 

 

  1. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
  2. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by that evidence.
  3. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
  4. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
  5. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.

选D是因为只有D中说第二个BF是main conclusion.

但是为什么第一个是中间结论呢? 觉得第一个top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness是evidence;those worrisome rumors must be false.才是中间结论。

请NN解答,谢谢!

请NN解答,谢谢!

请NN解答,谢谢!



[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-18 1:52:51编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-9-20 05:07:00 | 只看该作者
同问
板凳
发表于 2007-9-20 14:31:00 | 只看该作者

Since it has become known that several of a bank’s top executives have been buying shares in their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved.  They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false.

bold部分不是evidence,也是reasoning出来的,所以是intermediate conclusion

地板
发表于 2007-10-12 23:37:00 | 只看该作者

为什么是中间结论:BUY—HAVE FAITH---THEY REASON

5#
发表于 2008-6-9 01:49:00 | 只看该作者
up
6#
发表于 2008-8-8 05:02:00 | 只看该作者
up
7#
发表于 2008-8-8 08:38:00 | 只看该作者
注意第一个bold face里面的they reason还有executives "EVIDENTLY" have faith ...,说明银行头头们对银行有信心不是个fact,是作者推出来的,作者由什么推出头头们有信心呢?因为他们了解到头头们在买自己的股票。作者然后又根据头头们有信心推出传言是假的。所以第一个bold face是intermediate conclusion。

出题人故意把前两句话逻辑顺序打乱了来迷惑大家
正确的顺序应该是 银行头头买自己的股票-->头头显然对银行财务状况有信心-->传言银行要倒闭是假的 -->存钱的人心里松了一口气
8#
发表于 2009-8-2 10:19:00 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 12:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部