ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: joywzy
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 141 题目有误,限定从句

[精华] [复制链接]
21#
发表于 2004-5-2 16:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用LES在2004-4-29 15:12:00的发言:

Typo, confirmed by ETS!

Thank you for your inquiry regarding two Sentence Correction questions and
their explanations in The Official Guide for GMAT Review.


My colleagues and I have examined the questions and their explanations in
light of your inquiry, and we have determined that your confusion is
entirely justified:  there is a printing error in question 141, option C.
Nonrestrictive clauses should indeed be set off by parenthetical commas, and
there should therefore be a comma after "twins" in option C. We appreciate
your calling this error to our attention, and we will revise the question
for future editions of the Guide.


Thank you very much for taking the time to share your concern with us. We
are always grateful to receive inquiries such as yours because they help us
to improve the quality of our tests and test preparation materials.



GOOD!

佩服。。。。。。

22#
发表于 2004-5-2 22:28:00 | 只看该作者
太nn了....
23#
发表于 2004-5-3 10:14:00 | 只看该作者
别再说啦,偶会觉得不好意思的,

是这里的NN们让偶确信是ETS的错,所以才敢写信给ETS的。
24#
发表于 2004-5-4 12:27:00 | 只看该作者
LES功不可没也, 终于解决拉个大难题, 也谢谢flora-wang的重大发现.
25#
发表于 2004-5-21 07:11:00 | 只看该作者
ding again
26#
发表于 2004-5-21 08:58:00 | 只看该作者

WOW, WOW, WOW, I JUST CANNOT BELIEVE IT. GOOD LES MM.

27#
发表于 2004-5-22 00:16:00 | 只看该作者

照着楼上的说法非限定修饰一定有逗号隔开, 可是C中
Unless the transplant involves identical twins who have the same genetic endowment
这个who.... 从意义上说是非限定, OG的解释也说是非限定, 但又没有逗号啊?

28#
发表于 2004-5-22 11:53:00 | 只看该作者

That's AWESOME.

Did you tell them you guys are Chinese?

29#
发表于 2004-5-22 12:43:00 | 只看该作者
30#
发表于 2004-5-22 12:43:00 | 只看该作者
Ask me?

I told them I am a Chinese girl living in Shanghai.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 14:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部