ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3896|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP1-50, ASSUMPTION题,不会取非削弱,求助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-19 00:55:00 | 只看该作者

PREP1-50, ASSUMPTION题,不会取非削弱,求助

50.            (34317-!-item-!-188;#058&007562)

 

Generally scientists enter their field with the goal of doing important new research and accept as their colleagues those with similar motivation.  Therefore, when any scientist wins renown as an expounder of science to general audiences, most other scientists conclude that this popularizer should no longer be regarded as a true colleague.

 

The explanation offered above for the low esteem in which scientific popularizers are held by research scientists assumes that

 

(A) serious scientific research is not a solitary activity, but relies on active cooperation among a group of colleagues

(B) research scientists tend not to regard as colleagues those scientists whose renown they envy

(C) a scientist can become a famous popularizer without having completed any important research

(D) research scientists believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are not motivated to do important new research

(E) no important new research can be accessible to or accurately assessed by those who are not themselves scientists

此题答案我是通过分析文中第一句话得到的,但用LAWYER的取非削弱就不会了.

向大家来请教思路.谢谢

沙发
发表于 2007-6-19 05:13:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得D取非后就是

research scientist believe that those who are well known as popularizers of science are motivated to do important new research.那么就能满足作为合作者的条件。与结论相反

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-19 10:16:00 | 只看该作者
有点绕,我再仔细想想,谢谢楼上MM哈.
地板
发表于 2007-6-19 14:50:00 | 只看该作者

这题不要取非削弱,有一个GAP

条件:因为有相似的动机,科学家彼此视为同党;

结论:有科学家A搞科普,其他科学家不视之为同党。

“有相似的动机”和“科学家A搞科普”需要搭桥。

假设:“科学家A搞科普”不被视为“有相似的动机”。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-6-19 14:50:52编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-6-20 02:22:00 | 只看该作者

回77,这题确实用取非削弱真绕不出来了.呵呵.

但我自己认为最难的就是找这类题目里面的GAP.这是不是说明还是没有理清罗辑顺序? 我一般看完题就是理一句话出来,但从来看不出来里面的GAP,求赐教.

6#
发表于 2007-6-20 09:38:00 | 只看该作者

别这么客气,探讨而已

GAP一般是:条件:B推出C

           结论:A推出C

           搭桥或拆桥:A推出B;A推不出B

7#
发表于 2007-12-17 08:01:00 | 只看该作者
GWD的题吧,以前做过的
8#
发表于 2007-12-17 18:28:00 | 只看该作者
楼主能不能我一份PREP啊,感激不尽!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部