ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2044|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全3-15,怎么没有讨论过?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-6-10 13:55:00 | 只看该作者

大全3-15,怎么没有讨论过?

In the United States, the Postal Service has a monopoly on first-class mail, but much of what is sent first class could be transmitted electronically. Electronic transmittal operators argue that if the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it would have an unfair advantage, since its electronic transmission service could be subsidized from the profits of the monopoly.

15.   Which of the following, if each is true, would allay the electronic transmittal operators’ fears of unfair competition?

(A) If the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it could not make a profit on first-class mail.

(B) If the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it would have a monopoly on that kind of service.

(C) Much of the material that is now sent by first-class mail could be delivered much faster by special package couriers, but is not sent that way because of cost.

(D) There is no economy of scale in electronic transmission—that is, the cost per transaction does not go down as more pieces of information are transmitted.A

(E) Electronic transmission will never be cost-effective for material not sent by first-class mail such as newspapers and bulk mail.

沙发
发表于 2007-6-11 20:02:00 | 只看该作者
是不是选A啊, 他说If the Postal Service were to offer electronic transmission, it could not make a profit on first-class mail, 既然POSTSERVICE如果提供了electronic transmission, 就不能从first-class mail获得利润,那么 Electronic transmittal operators 说Postal Service 用从first-class mail获得的垄断利润支持electronic transmission service 就不能成立了啊, (没有利润, 怎么支持Electronic transmittal ?)
板凳
发表于 2007-6-12 23:18:00 | 只看该作者

怎么不贴答案

请问是选D么

地板
发表于 2007-6-12 23:57:00 | 只看该作者
支持A
5#
发表于 2007-9-23 15:00:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-3 12:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部