ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: adlinker
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 2-11 没看懂

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2007-10-23 23:22:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用adlinker在2007-6-10 7:51:00的发言:

这题是我见过的最BT的逻辑题了,居然要考长难句,出题人心里阴暗啊!谢谢楼上两位mm帮忙,这一下就清楚多了。  如果考试有这么BT的题,只能放弃了。                                                                                    

同意!

12#
发表于 2007-11-17 11:28:00 | 只看该作者

天,这是我一周前模考的第一题,当时时间紧,看不懂,模模糊糊选对了;今天在PREP又遇到了,看了6分钟,选了D,惨了!

自信心受到极其严重的打击,A到现在我都不知道啥意思:(

13#
发表于 2008-1-2 22:44:00 | 只看该作者

if any是插入语!没想到,以前没见过不加逗号的插入语。

14#
发表于 2008-1-5 04:17:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用s7s7在2007-6-10 7:41:00的发言:

A是说:1994年大多数有那个特殊设备的人,他们所在的地方都能收到那些电台的信号。

A直译:1994年向Verdland广播的电台(即便是有)也很少不能将信号发送到有特殊设备的人所居住的地区。

像这种双重否定的特殊句式、极其变态的表达方法,就是GMAT的最爱

(A) Few(主语) if any of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994 broadcast (谓语) to people with RDS-equipped radios living in areas not previously reached by RDS stations.修饰地区

那d说的是没有设备就不能收到,岂不是和a的意思一样,为什么不选D呢?
15#
发表于 2008-3-4 00:21:00 | 只看该作者

同问D,为什么不行呢?

D的取反,就是


 In 1996 Verdlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS could receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.

当没有RDS 收音机的人能听到RDS的节目,那么结论"the number of Verdlanders receiving the special program information probably did not increase significantly"就不成立了啊。这个难道不是判断assumption的条件么?


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-3-4 1:24:14编辑过]
16#
发表于 2008-3-4 08:47:00 | 只看该作者

汗...A的表达真拗口...

不过D好像不算是假设...这个本来就是题目给的条件...看懂A的情况下肯定优选A...

17#
发表于 2008-11-28 02:32:00 | 只看该作者
?????????????????????
18#
发表于 2009-4-17 22:41:00 | 只看该作者

Radio stations with radio data system (RDS) technology broadcast
special program information that only radios with an RDS feature can
receive.  Between 1994 and 1996, the number of RDS radio stations in
Verdland increased from 250 to 600.  However, since the number of
RDS-equipped radios in Verdland was about the same in 1996 as in 1994,
the number of Verdlanders receiving the special program information
probably did not increase significantly.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A)
Few if any of the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in
Verdland after 1994 broadcast to people with RDS-equipped radios living
in areas not previously reached by RDS stations.
(B) In 1996 most Verdlanders who lived within the listening area of an RDS station already had a radio equipped to receive RDS.
(C) Equipping a radio station with RDS technology does not decrease the station's listening area.
(D)
In 1996 Verdlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS
could not receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that
began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.
(E) The RDS radio stations in Verdland in 1996 did not all offer the same type of programming.

原题第一句

Radio stations with radio data system (RDS) technology broadcast
special program information that only radios with an RDS feature can
receive.

Radio stations with radio data system (RDS)----->radios with an RDS feature

原题结论

radios with an RDS feature same---->Radio stations with radio data system (RDS) same

两句推理方向相反

D. 非RDS radios---->非RDS radio station 即 RDS radio station --->RDS radios

与第一句相同,与结论相反,错

其他选项通过有关无关判断排除,只有A对

19#
发表于 2009-4-20 12:32:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用蓝夕叶子在2008-3-4 0:21:00的发言:

同问D,为什么不行呢?

D的取反,就是


 In 1996 Verdlanders who did not own radios equipped to receive RDS could receive any programming from the RDS radio stations that began broadcasting in Verdland after 1994.

当没有RDS 收音机的人能听到RDS的节目,那么结论"the number of Verdlanders receiving the special program information probably did not increase significantly"就不成立了啊。这个难道不是判断assumption的条件么?

为什么D 不能选,我也选错了 啊

20#
发表于 2009-9-5 14:30:00 | 只看该作者

A好复杂,研究了半天...

原来是在说  一些过去装备的RDS确收不到节目的人,这些人的存在没有使rds得数量增加,但是却可能使收到的节目数量增加,A正是排除了这点可能性

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 09:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部