GWD25-Q25 to 28

canols

你没理解coincide的意思，coincide是说occur at or during the same time；我的答案是DAAB

以下是引用goharvard在2008/8/31 16:08:00的发言：

25题我选A, 26A, 27A, 28B。

25.D是错的，NY Socialist参加这次movement不是coincide的,他们是主动commite to this movement希望利用这次运动的机会来实现自己的目的,并非如C所属是两件逻辑上独立的事情。

26.虽然我本来选C，但后来仔细看了觉得C是错的。关键是要联系题目的问题本身来看，问题问的是goal是什么，C讲的是women集中关注食品价格问题，但这个不是boycotting的原因，而只是对其boycutting的性质的描述，最终的goal还是落实到降价（文中表述：they saw cheaper food as a valuable end in itself）。虽然A的表达宽泛了一点，但是相对于C起码更加切题。

27.同意lz的观点和分析选A。E的观点narrow了一点，没有覆盖第三段讲boycutting women自己的一段。

28.认为答案B是对的。Inside NYS 有两种观点，认为要么间接推动了socialism，要么促进了Union organizing，ACDE都不全面。

danielleluv

26题谁能解释下
    

C.      concentration of widespread consumer
        protests on the
                more narrow issue of food prices 这个more narrow在哪里看出来的啊？？？

danielleluv

agree with 27 A.. C is the least correct answer..

cllcchocolat

看不懂...

苏27

28题肯定不选B，B说的是“some”，但是题目问的是“most"，硬伤啊！

running2k

我觉得这个阅读的答案应该是D C A B。关于27，没有讲到different approaches,所以肯定不对。文章第一段介绍背景，文章第二段讲的是socialists对 cost of living issue的view，第三段讲到women的view。而且第三段的开头“Although New York’s Socialists saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best, secondary or tertiary to the real task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. ”也做了总结。

关于25，要根据“trade union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women’s movement toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists’ brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. ”推断。

关于26，可以由以下推出来“the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by rising food prices drove these women to protest.”

28，这个我觉得提出的有问题，题中说的是most, 很容易就定位到“While some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or organizing was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States society one step closer to socialism” 但是主要是在于for others，这个others的指代，从上下文看，while some, most... For others, 应该是指most,然后原文改写就出了答案B。

这个文章真的很变态，感觉跟OG的套路不太一样，答案真的要INFER，而且是长段定位，综合考虑。

个人之见， 大家讨论。

zjqswmm

其他的就不说了 只是25   Underneath the Socialists’ brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. 这是原文 用了brief一词 所以就选A了

mary7985

我觉得这个阅读的答案应该是D C A B。关于27，没有讲到different approaches,所以肯定不对。文章第一段介绍背景，文章第二段讲的是socialists对 cost of living issue的view，第三段讲到women的view。而且第三段的开头“Although New York’s Socialists saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best, secondary or tertiary to the real task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. ”也做了总结。

关于25，要根据“trade union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women’s movement toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists’ brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. ”推断。

关于26，可以由以下推出来“the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by rising food prices drove these women to protest.”

28，这个我觉得提出的有问题，题中说的是most, 很容易就定位到“While some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or organizing was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States society one step closer to socialism” 但是主要是在于for others，这个others的指代，从上下文看，while some, most... For others, 应该是指most,然后原文改写就出了答案B。

这个文章真的很变态，感觉跟OG的套路不太一样，答案真的要INFER，而且是长段定位，综合考虑。

个人之见， 大家讨论。

-- by 会员 running2k (2009/12/24 13:11:10)

立小夏

我觉得这个阅读的答案应该是D C A B。关于27，没有讲到different approaches,所以肯定不对。文章第一段介绍背景，文章第二段讲的是socialists对 cost of living issue的view，第三段讲到women的view。而且第三段的开头“Although New York’s Socialists saw the cost-of-living issue as, at best, secondary or tertiary to the real task at hand, the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. ”也做了总结。

关于25，要根据“trade union organizing, seized the opportunity and quickly organized an extensive series of cost-of-living protests designed to direct the women’s movement toward Socialist goals. Underneath the Socialists’ brief commitment to cost-of-living organizing lay a basic indifference to the issue itself. ”推断。

关于26，可以由以下推出来“the boycotters, by sharp contrast, joined the price protest movement out of an urgent and deeply felt commitment to the cost-of-living issue. A shared experience of swiftly declining living standards caused by rising food prices drove these women to protest.”

28，这个我觉得提出的有问题，题中说的是most, 很容易就定位到“While some Socialists did view price protests as a direct step toward socialism, most Socialists ultimately sought to divert the cost-of-living movement into alternative channels of protest. Union organizing, they argued, was the best method through which to combat the high cost of living. For others, cost-of-living or organizing was valuable insofar as it led women into the struggle for suffrage, and similarly, the suffrage struggle was valuable insofar as it moved United States society one step closer to socialism” 但是主要是在于for others，这个others的指代，从上下文看，while some, most... For others, 应该是指most,然后原文改写就出了答案B。

这个文章真的很变态，感觉跟OG的套路不太一样，答案真的要INFER，而且是长段定位，综合考虑。

个人之见， 大家讨论。

-- by 会员 running2k (2009/12/24 13:11:10)

同意同意

sallyruru

personal view  DCAB