总是摸不清EVALUATION题的思路,请教大家GWD两题

maomm

1.         GWD-7-Q38:

Journalist:  Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run.  However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission.  So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

 

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist’s argument?

 

1. Has anybody else who has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for the upcoming election reported greater financial holdings than Bergeron?

2. Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?

3. Did the information recently obtained by the journalists come directly from the election commission?

4. Have Bergeron’s financial holdings increased in value in recent years?

5. Had Bergeron also fulfilled the financial disclosure requirements for candidacy before any previous gubernatorial elections?

E    

     GWD-7-Q41:

Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.

 

Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?

 

1. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book

2. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned

3. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews

4. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view

5. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes

c

以上两题虽然做对了, 但这种题的思路不会把握. 请大家来教教我.thks

lewton

我觉得最重要还是区分有关无关吧，对长得象正确答案的用可加强可削弱的test进行检验

以第一题为例，通过这个人填表递交资产证明，推出他要参加竞选

A：其他人,排除

B：only排除，取非不能削弱，有其他方法参加竞选，不能证明文中当事人就不参加

C:消息来源 D:资产上升

E:以前填过表吗.文中说以前没参加过选举.则取正,以前填过表也没参加选举,削弱结论,说明这次也未必参加.取非,以前没填过表,加强结论,虽然逻辑不是很严密

我个人认为逻辑题就象木木姐说得那样,读完题目要理解,然后预测答案,这样再看选项无关选项就都很明显,不然以中国人的思路,想得太复杂,很多无关选项都可以作为正确,违背了白痴思维原则

个人意见

maomm

IC,thanks a lot!!!