LSAT-28-3-23

mythicalman

Whenever she considers voting in an election to select one candidate for a position and there is at least one issue important to her, Kay uses the following principle in choosing which course of action to take: it is acceptable for me to vote for a candidate whose opinions differ from mine on at least one issue important to me whenever I disagree with each of the other candidates on even more such issues; it is otherwise unacceptable to vote for that candidate. In the upcoming mayoral election, the three candidates are Legrand, Medina, and Norton. There is only one issue important to Kay, and only Medina shares her opinion on that issue.

23. According to the principle stated in the passage, in the upcoming mayoral election

(A) it is acceptable for Kay to vote for either Medina or Legrand, but it is unacceptable for her to vote for Norton.

(B) the only unacceptable courses of action are for Kay to vote for any of the candidates.

(C) it is unacceptable for Kay to vote for any of the candidates.

(D) the only unacceptable course of action is for Kay to vote for Medina.

(E) it is acceptable for Kay to vote for any of the candidates.

B

请问B和C有什么区别？KAY不是可以选MEDINA？

番茄炒蛋

KAY可以选MEDINA，但是没有这个答案
B和C的区别在于前面的那个ONLY
B的范围更小，更精确，所以选B

你吃饭了吗
A，我吃过了
B,我刚吃了蛋炒饭

呵呵，答案选B

mythicalman

B的意思是不是
“唯一不能接受的行为是KAY选三个候选人中的任何一个。”
既然KAY可以选M，B和c不是都错了？

番茄炒蛋

三个人的候选条件对于KAY来说是不一样的，所以在投票的时候不可能一视同仁
所以it is unacceptable for Kay to vote for any of the candidates
但由于B的条件限制比C要更严格，而且B又没有错，所以应该是选B

mythicalman

哪个大侠再解释解释，
我现在理解连选M也推不出来。因为文中没有说意见相同就一定要选，所以M也可以不选。