[求助]有谁能帮我看一下我的文章

qqgeogor

do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
children should not have to work or help with household tasks:their only responsibility should be to study


some parents argue that a child should not work or do the househood,for the reason they think the only responsibility for a child is to study.this oppion is welcome by some parents,but the majority prefer their children do help them with the household which is essential for the children.in their oppion,do the houeshold is nessery is nesseray for a child who is sure to live alone inthe future.

firtst of all, when the child grow up,he hor she have got no choise but live alone.that is to say no one will do him or her a fovor to clean the room or do the washes.it is obviously important that a child have to do the household when he or she is yooung,by which time he or she will learn to deal with the difficulties during the work.a child who do the washes or clean his or her own room seems to be more independent when they gorw up.in a rescent research,65.2% of the people who live alone confortablly do the household at home in their childhood,while the rest of the interviewee who do not do so lead a poor life since they can not take crae of themselves.

anonther reason i want to say is that do the household sometimes have the effect of releasing oneself.is it justifiable that a child do the assignment or read book all day long can get a good effect?the anwser is no.a new discovery made by oxford university says children doing the household sometimes can give them a rest,which is more considerable than learning for the whole day.

it is also fundamental for one who is desiding to get a part time job in restuarant.the restarant prefers expierenced one than the people who even do not konw how to wash plates,which is an advantage for the one who learned how to do the household.

though i think learning is of great importance,i still regard doing household as nesseraity which a child have to do so.

qqgeogor

do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the things we learn from our friends are more important than what we learn from our family.

as it is to me, i both learn from my friends and my parents,becaues they have some advantage that i have not get.however i learn more form my parents with whom i spent most of my time to live.which is more dominant to my study and can benifit my learning.

 first of all, parents are obviously expierenced.they live more than us that they seems to have got more expirence.which can help us when we do something for the first time.when you write your first letter,you parents will tell you how to sent it.when a problem of your assignment is very hard to deal whith,though they will never do it instead of you,they can give out some tips or teach you in which way you can solve it.that is to say one can get advise from parent so as to learn more.

 further more,parents are more available,which the contast is that you have not got many time to stay with a friend to exchange oppion.it is a great advantage that we can learn things every minute.your parents may tell you to keep good honor when you are having a meal.they will also remind you to keep a distance when you are waching tv. they may odder you to clear your own room yourself which is essential.all of the things above that your parents tell you to do are fundamental for your life,something good for your health to which there are some saying like "health is the most important",which you can only learn from your parents.

it is no doubt that one can learn a lot of things from his or her freinds such as how to get along with others,how to finish a work in group,but the things one can learn from one's parents are more important,becuase he or she will ues them through out the life.finally,it is more considerable to learn form parents rather than from friends

qqgeogor

some peole learn by reading about things.others learn by doing things.which of these methods of learning is better for you/

people learn things in defferent ways,some learn from readings books while others prefer to learing by doning things.in my oppion,it is more considerable to learn by reading books.
books are available every.it also convinient for us to study whereever we are.anther reason is that through books we can get more knowledge than only dongthings.

with the development of the society,the thecnology of printing is wild used.so we are able to get books easily.if we want to read some books,we have the oppurtunity to go to a library.we can borrow books from our teachers or friends which is also of great convience.we can also buy books from a book store.so learing became more easy.

learing by doing things requares a lot.we have to do the things in a certain place which means we have got no freedom while we are learing.so i would like to learn by reading books.books are small enough for us to put it in bags or carry with one.that is to say learning can be available whereever or whenever we are.we can learn when we are on a bus.we can learn in a park.we can enven read a book when we are in restroom since books are portable.

there are defferent kinds of books which contian a large number of knowledge.that is to say we can learn from reading far more than diong things.we can learn phycology , biology or geography all of which we can not learn from doing things.

it is true that we can learn some things by doing things.however reading gives us more fundamental and various knowledge.for most kind of things we can learn from a books,i prefer learning from books.