AA37-该文的逻辑为何如此别扭？

big_rice

这是AA37 ，逻辑驳论文。（作文区有人问过，但是石沉大海。所以贴到了逻辑区。）

该文的逻辑为何如此别扭？不但英文理解不了，中文也难以理解。还望各位大虾指点啊。

Motorcycle X has been manufactured in the United States for over 70 years. Although one foreign company has copied the motorcycle and is selling it for less, the company has failed to attract motorcycle X customers—some say because its product lacks the exceptionally loud noise made by motorcycle X. But there must be some other explanation. After all, foreign cars tend to be quieter than similar American-made cars, but they sell at least as well. Also, television advertisements for motorcycle X highlight its durability and sleek lines, not its noisiness, and the ads typically have voice-overs or rock music rather than engine-roar on the sound track.

1. 这篇文章讨论的对象是一个外国公司（他复制了这种摩托并低价推出，但是该公司却不能吸引X的顾客的原因），而不是Motorcycle X company，对么？

2. 他的因果解释是：因为没有大噪声，所以没有吸引来X的客户，对么？(倒，这个理由真BT)

3.最后一句划线什么意思呢？

多谢了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-17 22:39:19编辑过]

lewton

晕，我考试的AA题目....

对象是外国公司,该公司复制了X公司的车,并低价卖,但卖得不好.有人说是因为它没有X车的大噪音.但还因有别的解释,因为一般外国车都比美国车安静,但许多外国车都卖得不错.另外,X车的广告并没有强调它的大噪音,并且广告中一般都放很吵的摇滚乐而不是发动机轰鸣的声音.

可以写广告没强调不代表就不是受消费者喜爱的特点,别的安静外国车卖的好不代表该公司也能卖得好,或者说不能吸引X的顾客不代表卖得就不好.....