ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: aqua20061206
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-Q41的题干的大意?

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2011-10-14 14:47:26 | 只看该作者
以下是引用aqua20061206在2007-5-10 21:43:00的发言:
GWD7-Q41:



Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.  Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.



Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?


Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?



    Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
    Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
    Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
    Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
    Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes
凭感觉选对了,能帮我解释一下提干吗(有点读不顺)?谢谢




结论:杂志的出版商声称自己的杂志没有自由主义的倾向。
论据:去年其收到一篇委托的书评,其有明显的保守主义倾向,于是杂志社就没有发表,直到后来又收到一篇明显自由主义倾向的书评。

C是说,如果杂志社第一次收到的就是有自由主义倾向的书评,是不是还会去找其它的书评?
如果答案是,那就说明杂志社没有倾向。如果不是,就说明其有自由主义的倾向。
注意“Whether in the event
           that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position
           the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews” that... 是做event的同位语。

其它答案都很好排除,D是说“是否其书评的对象这本书是否有倾向”,这和杂志社是否有倾向无关。
-- by 会员 fogwind (2008/5/3 23:46:00)


我觉得这道题应该这么理解:
Magazine Publisher:Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.It is true that when a book review we had commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a strongly liberal position.Clearly, however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.
杂志发行者声称其杂志没有偏向于自有主义。诚然去年我们收到一份书评表示了明显的保守主义倾向,但是我们没有发表知道收到另外一份有强烈自有主义倾向的观点。但是,这不代表我们杂志倾向于自由主义观点,只是为了(出于有多样化的观点考虑)有平衡性的观点。
Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher's response?

如果要证明杂志社的说法有说服力,那么必须评价下列哪个观点?

A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
杂志发表的其他书评是否不止是一个观点?
回答Yes或者No,都对上述的说服力影响不大。上面说的是自由主义和保守主义。


B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
是否杂志发表的书评有未经允许的,和经允许的。
回答Yes或No,都与自由主义和保守主义无关。


C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
是否杂志收到的第一份书评有强烈的自由主义观点,而后杂志会去找寻进一步的(不同)观点?
回答Yes的话,说明杂志是希望balance的不同观点的书评,而不是本身有强烈的自由主义倾向;回答No的话,说明杂志就是有这样的倾向!而不是他们so-called balance something...


D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
讨论书了,与题无关。


E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes
讨论读者的读书评的经常性,更加无关。


Then 选C



Determining which of the following would be most useful in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher's response?

如果要证明杂志社的说法有说服力,那么必须评价下列哪个观点?

A. Whether any other magazines in which the book was reviewed carried more than one review of the book
杂志发表的其他书评是否不止是一个观点?
回答Yes或者No,都对上述的说服力影响不大。上面说的是自由主义和保守主义。


B. Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews as well as those that it has commissioned
是否杂志发表的书评有未经允许的,和经允许的。
回答Yes或No,都与自由主义和保守主义无关。


C. Whether in the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews
是否杂志收到的第一份书评有强烈的自由主义观点,而后杂志会去找寻进一步的(不同)观点?
回答Yes的话,说明杂志是希望balance的不同观点的书评,而不是本身有强烈的自由主义倾向;回答No的话,说明杂志就是有这样的倾向!而不是他们so-called balance something...


D. Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of view
讨论书了,与题无关。


E. Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly read the book reviews that the magazine publishes
讨论读者的读书评的经常性,更加无关。


Then 选C
22#
发表于 2011-11-5 04:50:51 | 只看该作者
膜拜LS
解释的不错
23#
发表于 2011-11-19 11:21:03 | 只看该作者
thanks
24#
发表于 2012-1-26 23:35:53 | 只看该作者
都解释得好绕啊。。没那么复杂吧。我感觉只需要找能做到“balanced”的选项就行了。得到了liberal的之后就努力得到conservative的。就ok了~~
25#
发表于 2012-3-3 07:46:06 | 只看该作者
懂了!!!
26#
发表于 2012-3-24 15:37:51 | 只看该作者
mark
27#
发表于 2013-4-29 21:33:12 | 只看该作者
好厉害!!
28#
发表于 2013-11-17 18:53:57 | 只看该作者
crazysalad 发表于 2011-10-14 14:47
以下是引用aqua20061206在2007-5-10 21:43:00的发言:GWD7-Q41:Magazine Publisher:  Our magaz ...

看了你的解释 俺才懂啊!赞一个
29#
发表于 2013-11-18 18:07:33 | 只看该作者
謝謝21樓的解釋
30#
发表于 2014-2-6 18:15:42 | 只看该作者
fogwind 发表于 2008-5-3 23:46
以下是引用aqua20061206在2007-5-10 21:43:00的发言:GWD7-Q41:Magazine Publisher:  Our magazine do ...

牛人!!分析非常到位!!!!!!!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 05:00
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部