紧急求助~GWD-29-8

blueice

Which of the following, if true, provides evidence that most logically completes the argument below?

 

According to a widely held economic hypothesis, imposing strict environmental regulations reduces economic growth.  This hypothesis is undermined by the fact that the states with the strictest environmental regulations also have the highest economic growth.  This fact does not show that environmental regulations promote growth, however, since ______.

 

1. those states with the strictest environmental regulations invest the most in education and job training
2. even those states that have only moderately strict environmental regulations have higher growth than those with the least-strict regulations
3. many states that are experiencing reduced economic growth are considering weakening their environmental regulations
4. after introducing stricter environmental regulations, many states experienced increased economic growth
5. even those states with very weak environmental regulations have experienced at least some growth

答案是A

为什么啊？我怎么觉得一点关系都没有呢？

我选E~~

lingling7615

答案是a

growth是人力资本投资换来的

minirainbow

A是证明 strictest environmental regulation→education and job training→growth↑

 

算是带入他因来说明为何growth上升

 

 

 

只是这边我认为(E)也没有错阿………..

 

即使没有严格限制的国家也会经历一些经济成长…….

 

恩~~

 

自己翻译出来之后又很像通了

 

反复再看一遍原文

 

原文说：证据是有严格限制的国家也有很高经济成长，然后这个事实并不是说环境限制带动经济成长，而是…………………………..

 

 

似乎很明显要我们「带入他因」

 

而不是单纯的像(E)，只是反驳环境限制带动经济成长…………

 

 

 

一点小见解…………　　

水里游

以下是引用lingling7615在2007-5-10 22:40:00的发言：

答案是a

growth是人力资本投资换来的

哦，这下懂了~ 开始没看懂这个Invest in education...和题目的关系……