OG 1

hellen-wen · 发表于 2004-8-4 23:51:00

Divorce occurred when (divorce) a child

括号中的divorce, 为什么是省略啊? 能帮我解释一下吗?

hpp920 · 发表于 2004-8-5 03:46:00

To joe11, 谢谢你, 我已弄懂了自己的问题.这里that是不能省的.

T0: hellen-wen: when 从句是occured的时间壮语, occured的主语就suppose 是when 从句省略的主语.

goodgoodstudy · 发表于 2004-8-18 23:30:00

Still confused, in og:

"...Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; ...... C corrects only the error created by occurring. ..."

这里OG像是说: A用occuring不对, 而C用that occured 就消除了"illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child" 的错误. why? 不都是引导了定语来修饰divorce吗? 请NN解惑!

agk99 · 发表于 2004-8-19 00:02:00

事實上，只要occur的前面沒有逗號，你寫成occurring when they were children或是that occurred when they were children 都行，A的錯和C的錯，都是後面的a child 出現了歧異

goodgoodstudy · 发表于 2004-8-19 03:07:00

感谢楼上帮助! But it seemed that you did not answer my question!

再问!

pinesong · 发表于 2004-8-25 22:03:00

请大牛回答，这里occurring 能否使用，正确用法应该如何，谢谢了

leeon · 发表于 2004-8-26 11:00:00

现在分词表示动作的反复、正在进行和延续，用在这里明显不合适，况且后面还有时间状语when，只能是过去分词表示一次性发生的动作。

cht001 · 发表于 2004-8-27 11:46:00

great

acro20acro · 发表于 2004-9-6 16:01:00

Can anyone advise?

In choice A, why does ETS say that “occurring” illogically makes divorce the grammatical referent of when a child? "that occurred" should induce the illogical modification as well, such as C, D, or E. Any input?

rhod · 发表于 2004-9-6 23:23:00

分词有连续不断的动作的含义，所以总不能说一直在离婚吧，那也太惨了...

OG 1

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()