以下是引用joywzy在2003-11-14 15:20:00的发言: 1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child. A. occurring when a child B. occurring when children C. that occurred when a child D. that occurred when they were children E. that has occurred as each was a child
Choice D is best. The phrasing a divorce that occurred when they were children correctly uses the relative clause that occurred to modify a divorce and includes a pronoun and verb (they were) that refer unambiguously to their antecedent, men and women. Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; furthermore, the singular child does not agree with the plural men and women. B replaces child with children but otherwise fails to correct A's errors of structure and logic, and C corrects only the error created by occurring. Choice E includes an incorrect verb tense (has occurred) and wrongly replaces when with as. Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.
OG的解释:Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child是什么意思啊?
谢谢.
The complete form of choice A is "occurring when (divorce was) a child" .
Note:The clause is 'A divorce occured when (it was) a child', the logic subject (which is the subject of the clause) and link verb are omitted. So if you want to restore the omitted part, you have to use the subject of the sentence plus be. It is a rule, so memorize it. Of cource the meaning of this clause is absurd, so A is wrong.
Pls refer to 《新编英语语法,章振邦》P1153,chapter36,无动词分句。
|