DUKE Fuqua 商学院学生作弊事件，CNN,ABC等主要媒体都进行了报道。

ffkly

<p>记得我在国内大学的时候也发生过一次集体作弊的事情，涉及到20几个人，不过最后大事化小了，只给2个主谋轻微的警告处分，其他人都没事</p>

graceyin7

In a mature society, mature citizens will have their ways of discussion and of learning some lessons from this event.

phxmu

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>adios</i>在2007-5-6 2:24:00的发言：</b><br/><p>people often mix good vs. bad, and right vs. wrong.</p><p>while disclosing the names is certainly a bad thing to do according to chinese standard, it is not necessary the wrong thing to do according to the federal privacy act.</p><p>FPA prohibits disclosure from agencies (such as Duke in this case), but not info gained via private sources.</p></div><p>Are you sure about this? I have not studied the US laws about this, but my intuition tells me better not do it.</p><p>I can understand that CD, as an agency, according to your statement,&nbsp;would rather avoid being involved in disclosing names, even if it is done by some individuals.</p><p>If you can find the names through a US media, tell me.</p>

adios

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>phxmu</i>在2007-5-6 2:45:00的发言：</b><br/><p>Are you sure about this? I have not studied the US laws about this, but my intuition tells me better not do it.</p><p>I can understand that CD, as an agency, according to your statement,&nbsp;would rather avoid being involved in disclosing names, even if it is done by some individuals.</p><p>If you can find the names through a US media, tell me.</p></div><p>your intuition may not be right, and CD is not an agency in this case.</p><p>but again this is&nbsp;what i understood&nbsp;from my law class, so i cannot guarantee the accuracy.</p><p>for the case of US media publishing names, it is the same thing as you can gain court order or criminal records under someone's name if he or she breaches the law, but newspaper may not&nbsp;do so unless it helps&nbsp;the circulation.</p><p>an easier way to think about this is: what about publishing names of those sex offenders? so they can commit rape and have their names hidden from the public?</p><p>again, i believe it is bad to publish those students' names, but we should argue it from the perspective that they have had enough, and we should give them time and space to recover.</p><br /><div align="right"><font color="#000066">[此贴子已经被作者于2007-5-6 7:08:01编辑过]</font></div>

wwwzzz

<p>MITBBS上有很多人在起哄和传播隐私，很是幸灾乐祸。这帮人恐怕都是吃不到葡萄的——吃得着的人，不会是这种心态。</p><p></p>

dawncq

Whatever, cheating is not good

natashaa

<p>我不相信duke的中国学生这么多会参与进去的！这些不负责任的网站的消息是没有事实根据的阿！</p>

maacid

<p>我以前也不信，以为又是那次南韩枪击案。但是多维网的正规新闻已经报了，就是有大批的中国人。国内的朋友可能上不了多维网。新闻里说，被开除的学生里，中国学生和南韩学生多是因为亚洲学生供认不讳。真是坦白从宽，牢底坐穿。</p>

maacid

多维网确实没有把名字公布，但是已经确认，中国人的人数。还说名字已经泄漏，是因为校内的内鬼

pizi

敢问在申请的时候没作假虚构的有几个？