DUKE Fuqua 商学院学生作弊事件，CNN,ABC等主要媒体都进行了报道。

adios

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>davidli8888</i>在2007-5-4 8:03:00的发言：</b><br/><p></p><p>While death penalty cannot terminate the murder, but it serves as an effective measure to discourage murder/assassination -the final possible punish, once convinced, is certain and severe. </p><p>Expulsion is very severe and hence should be cautious in use. But such&nbsp;toughness will for sure prevent some cheating in MBA programs, if not all. Cheating is attractive only the benefits derived from it are larger than the possible cost or punishment.</p><p></p></div><p>i would say these students were just bad luck, and maybe they really pissed off the school, or maybe just because of the scale.</p><p>sad news for all of us.</p>

davidli8888

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>adios</i>在2007-5-4 8:17:00的发言：</b><br/><p>i would say these students were just bad luck, and maybe they really pissed off the school, or maybe just because of the scale.</p><p>sad news for all of us.</p></div><p></p><p>I do not think it is a simple bad-luck issue. There is something there which makes the tragedy a sure thing. Please try to learn something from it. I'd like to share some comment made by a foreign tutor teaching in China.</p><p>Quote<!--Element not supported - Type: 8 Name: #comment--></p><p>&nbsp;<span class="userName">Old China Hand</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span class="timeStamp">May 2, 2007 9:28 PM GMT</span><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>I would like more information on the international contingent of cheaters at Duke's b-school. Having taught at Chinese business schools over the past decade, I have seen these same sort of cheating become routine. Many if not most (and I am not exaggerating here) Chinese MBA's hire (via Internet sites) people to sit for their GMATs; on finals, it is common for students to leave to answer telephone calls; peering over shoulders is routine; and in executive classes, top executives regularly delegate their exam questions to underlings. What we are seeing at Duke is simply and internationalization of business school ethics. </p><p>Unquote</p><p></p>

graceyin7

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>ffkly</i>在2007-5-6 1:58:00的发言：</b><br/><p>这里不允许发和这个相关的帖子的？</p></div><p>A few discussions were just canceled on CD. Don't know why...</p>

graceyin7

I don't know why this event is not allowed to be discussed...

phxmu

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>graceyin7</i>在2007-5-6 2:05:00的发言：</b><br/>I don't know why this event is not allowed to be discussed...</div><p></p>你不是还好好的在这里吗。删掉的帖子是因为里面有内容侵犯了个人隐私。你可以看到ｆｕｑｕａ网站上对此发布的新闻稿。但是，Ｄｕｋｅ没有告诉你的东西，有的就属于个人隐私，将其在网站上发布是侵犯个人隐私权的行为。

graceyin7

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>phxmu</i>在2007-5-6 2:09:00的发言：</b><br/><p></p>你不是还好好的在这里吗。删掉的帖子是因为里面有内容侵犯了个人隐私。你可以看到ｆｕｑｕａ网站上对此发布的新闻稿。但是，Ｄｕｋｅ没有告诉你的东西，有的就属于个人隐私，将其在网站上发布是侵犯个人隐私权的行为。</div><p>But the significance of this event can still be a topic of discussion.</p>

adios

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>phxmu</i>在2007-5-6 2:09:00的发言：</b><br/><p></p>你不是还好好的在这里吗。删掉的帖子是因为里面有内容侵犯了个人隐私。你可以看到ｆｕｑｕａ网站上对此发布的新闻稿。但是，Ｄｕｋｅ没有告诉你的东西，有的就属于个人隐私，将其在网站上发布是侵犯个人隐私权的行为。</div><p>people often mix good vs. bad, and right vs. wrong.</p><p>while disclosing the names is certainly a bad thing to do according to chinese standard, it is not necessary the wrong thing to do according to the federal privacy act.</p><p>FPA prohibits disclosure from agencies (such as Duke in this case), but not info gained via private sources.</p>

graceyin7

<div class="maxcode-quote"><b>以下是引用<i>adios</i>在2007-5-6 2:24:00的发言：</b><br/><p>people often mix good vs. bad, and right vs. wrong.</p><p>while disclosing the names is certainly a bad thing to do according to chinese standard, it is not necessary the wrong thing to do according to the federal privacy act.</p><p>FPA prohibits disclosure from agencies (such as Duke in this case), but not info gained via private sources.</p></div><p>Agree.</p><p>Good and bad is something about moral values while right and wrong (or legally right &amp; wrong) is something about law. The following is my personal speculation: Fuqua has its reasons why the names of the students were not disclosed. Perhaps it involves something sensitive in American society, such as race.</p>

adios

<p>and anyway, their lives are ruined by the school and the media - the names have been all around the web already.</p><p>what CD should do is just to delete all the posts, rather than letting people arguing here.</p>