大全-1-16,大全-2-5

dabendan12

Sec1-16.
In a political system with only wo major parties, the entrance of a third-party candidate into an election race damages the chances of only one of the two major candidates. The third-party candidate always attracts some of the voters who might otherwise have voted for one of the two major candidates, but not voters who support the other candidates. Since a third-party candidacy affects the two major candidates unequally, for reasons neither of them has any control over, the practice is unfair and should not be allowed.
If the factual information in the passage above is true, which of the following can be most reliably inferred from it?
(A) If the political platform of the third party is a compromise position between that of the two major parties, the third party will draw its voters equally from the two major parties.
(B) If, before the emergence of a third party, voters where diviede equally between the two major parties, neither of the major parties is likely to capture much more than one-harlf of the vote.
(C) A third-party candidate will not capture the votes of new voters who have never voted for candidates of either of the two major parties.
(D) The political stance of a third party will be more radical than that of either of the two major parties.
(E) The founders of a third aprty are likely to be a coalition consisting of former leaders of the tw major parties.
我所理解的这道题是这样的:
有候选人majorA,majorB,and others C. Voters 的分配比例为:42,39,11.现在有D的加入,他不从C那里吸引voter, 而是从A,B那里吸引本来不得不选他们的人.这样一来,A,B的机会就被破坏了.所以这种pratice不应该提倡.
答案是B.当然,由于C的存在,并且选票要平分,使得A,B在D出现之前他们的选票分配最多最多只是约等于50%,如果C的分配比例只有接近与零的情况下.

但是我不明白的是(C). 做INFER题的规则就是REPEAT原文.我觉得(C)恰好REPEAT了原文.为什么不对?

Sec2-5
The city's public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be virorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that:
(A) the provate firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry
(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs
(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs
(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm
(E) the municipal vovernment would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

我想这应该是一道归纳题. 答案是B.我的问题是这道题应该怎样写前提和结论才能容易得到答案?
我是这样写的:
P: public--~raise fares +~cost reductions
                private--profit pursue
C: transportation system 应该私有化
所以牵涉到的就只有,public, raise fares, cost, private, profit pursue, 怎么也扯不上political considerations.

请教高人指点!谢谢!

深海的小美人鱼

The city's public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it （politically ）impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service.
注意这个（politically ）impssible...这个是原因。所以加强结论的时候加强造成结论的原因