GWD-24-16，答案是否给错了？

Sacramento_CA

Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?

According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown. A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield. If both of these sources are accurate, however, the “Report on Tourism” for the region must be in error in stating that   .

1. the average length of stay is longer at the largest hotel in Harristown than it is at the Royal Arms Hotel.

2. There is only one hotel in Harristown that is larger than the Royal Arms Hotel.

3. More tourists stay in hotels in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel.

4. The Royal Arms hotel is the largest hotel in Springfield

5. The Royal Arms hotel is the only hotel in Springfield.

做的是GWD-22-10套出现的16题，我选了E，答案给了B，答案错的吧？

jzq

同问，我也选了E

我想关键问题是不是对于“in error in stating ”的理解呢？

我的理解是report错误的给出了。。。

请教一下，谢谢！！

pangpangshin

If both of these sources are accurate 说明原文的两个报道都没错

我的理解是问报道忽略了什么?

可想到因素有二:

1.两市宾馆数量不同

2.所比宾馆的承载量不同

B选项都含盖了

原文对两宾馆进行类比,所以选项里应将两宾馆都包括,才能说明其比较范围的错误

E选项只说明其中一个

我的理解

 

dictionary20

恩~答案应该是E的~

sdcar2010

From the stimulus, we know two facts:
(1) Springfield promotional material says that more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than in neighboring city Harristown
(2) The largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in there than in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield

Both facts are considered true.  Then the stimulus says that "Report on Tourism" must be wrong by saying the blank (our answer choice).  Apparently the Report must have said something controdictory to either or both of the two facts we just learnt.

Answer choice (E), "the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield" is correct answer to fill in the blank because if (E) is true, then Fact (2) is true but Fact (1) must be false.